Back

Mutational bias shapes protein evolution across RNA viruses

Efimenko, B.; Voronka, A.; Skripskaya, V.; Timonina, V.; Agranovsky, A.; Yurov, V.; Khrapko, K.; Fellay, J.; Gunbin, K.; Popadin, K.

2026-07-09 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.07.737047 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mutational biases can influence genome composition, but their contribution to protein evolution remains difficult to quantify. Here we utilize a nearly neutral framework that translates nucleotide mutational spectra into expected amino acid substitution patterns and equilibrium amino acid compositions. Using SARS-CoV-2 as a model system, we show that the viral mutational spectrum explains more than 50% of the variation in observed single-nucleotide amino acid substitutions and predicts the overall direction of proteome-wide amino acid composition change during the COVID-19 pandemic. The predictive power of the model varies with selection regime: effectively neutral and weakly deleterious substitutions conform most closely to the mutational expectation, whereas strongly constrained sites and mutational hotspots show larger deviations. This indicates that departures from the nearly neutral baseline provide a quantitative proxy for purifying and positive selection. Extending the analysis across 34 RNA virus species, we find that positive-sense, negative-sense and double-stranded RNA viruses differ systematically in their mutational spectra, and that these differences are associated with predictable shifts in proteome composition. The same relationship is detectable in RNA-dependent RNA polymerase sequences from more than 77,000 viral species. These results indicate that taxon-specific mutational bias contributes persistently to protein evolution across evolutionary scales.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.9%
2
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.1%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.5%
4
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.5%
6
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.9%
9
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
13
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
15
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.6%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%