Back

The Blood RNA Stability Atlas: defining temporal structure and trait-state programs in the human whole-blood transcriptome

Baltazar, W. C.; Messing, R. O.; Ferguson, L.

2026-07-08 genomics
10.64898/2026.07.07.737044 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whole-blood RNA biomarkers are widely used for diagnosis and disease monitoring, but their utility depends not only on abundance but also on temporal stability, a property that is not routinely incorporated into biomarker design. We analyzed 968 longitudinal whole-blood transcriptomes from 165 healthy individuals across eight independent studies spanning diverse platforms, time scales (50 minutes to 16 weeks), and common environmental exposures. Using a cross-study analytical framework integrating variance partitioning, repeatability, and time-associated differential expression, we quantified temporal stability for 6,064 RNAs and classified transcripts into "trait" (stable) and "state" (dynamic) categories representing the extremes of longitudinal changes in transcript abundance. We identified 1,118 trait RNAs exhibiting stable within-individual levels of abundance but substantial inter-individual variability, enriched for whole-blood eGenes (P = 6.0 x 10-20), supporting a genetic basis for stability. In contrast, 1,504 state RNAs showed context-dependent temporal variation and were enriched for translation and RNA-binding pathways. Integration with genetic datasets revealed that 4,395 (72%) blood transcripts were linked to at least one whole-blood eQTL, collectively associated with 18,358 GWAS trait relationships, providing disease-relevant context for transcript stability. We developed the Blood RNA Stability Atlas to integrate these features and demonstrate both top-down (disease-to-gene) and bottom-up (gene-to-context) applications for biomarker prioritization and interpretation. These findings establish temporal stability as a defining property of the blood transcriptome and provide a practical, publicly accessible framework for distinguishing stable baseline abundance levels from context-dependent transcriptional responses, informing biomarker selection, study design, and hypothesis generation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.0%
2
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
3
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.8%
4
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
6
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
8
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
15
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.1%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.8%
23
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%