Back

Integrating Bottleneck Size into Selection Tests for Biological Diversity Data

Le, T. M. T.; Gjini, E.

2026-07-10 genetics
10.64898/2026.07.07.737025 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Population bottlenecks profoundly shape genetic diversity, but distinguishing stochastic drift from selective pressure requires precise estimation and accounting for bottleneck size. While deep-sequencing data enable inference via frameworks like beta-binomial modeling, integrating these estimates directly into selection tests remains a critical challenge. In this study, based on existing computational approaches, we propose a new method that explicitly incorporates bottleneck size estimates into neutrality tests for biological diversity data. Designed for variant frequency data, our framework accounts for sequencing errors and sampling biases to improve the precision and interpretability of selection signature detection. We validate this framework using previously published Streptococcus pneumoniae in vivo experimental data, successfully replicating established fitness results, while uncovering novel genes relevant to infection and pathogenesis. This integrated new model with explicit bottleneck effects narrows down the set of candidate genes under selection and provides a robust, generalizable tool for disentangling drift from selection across a wide range of biological systems.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.6%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.7%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.3%
4
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.3%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
5.5%
6
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
8
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
10
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
12
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
17
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
20
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.9%
23
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.9%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
26
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%