Somatic mutation inference from single-cell transcriptomics: A survey in the esophagus
Mendez-Alejandre, A.; Gonzalez-Menendez, D.; Vidal-Notari, S.; Skrupskelyte, G.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, M.; Ajith, H.; Torralba, A. S.; Alcolea, M. P.; Piedrafita, G.
Show abstract
Human somatic tissues accumulate mutations during normal aging. Some of these affect cancer-associated driver genes and confer mutant progenitor cells a competitive advantage that leads to clonal expansions. The human esophageal epithelium exemplifies this phenomenon, becoming a dense mosaic of competing mutant clones by adulthood. However, the phenotypic consequence of those mutations and their possible role in carcinogenesis remains unknown. Novel bioinformatic tools for de novo mutant detection from single-cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq) could potentially leverage on the wealth of publicly available data to help draw mutant cell phenotypes in vivo. In this study we test SComatic algorithms ability to identify somatic mutations in the normal, polyclonal esophageal epithelium. We analyze a public scRNA-seq dataset from a human cohort with multiple esophageal samples per donor, and an independent study in mice subjected to experimental mutagenesis where samples have been re-sequenced for validation. These unconventional experimental designs allow us to control unspecificity. We observe scRNA-seq variant calling output is heavily affected by undesired technical artifacts and germline variants, which we are able to reduce following a customized series of rational filters that enrich in somatic mutations. Final candidate mutations are then used to reconstitute clonal lineages and map them to differentiation trajectories in the UMAP embeddings. We find low read depth and sparse cellular sampling favor detection of passenger mutations and hinder driver mutant phenotypic inferences. Altogether, we showcase current limitations of scRNA-seq-derived mutation calling, while we offer methodological indications that should be considered for future studies aimed at investigating mutant clone behavior in normal polyclonal tissues from single-cell transcriptomics.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of isoforms and genomic alterations by high-throughput full-length single-cell RNA sequencing in ovarian cancer 95%
- Cross-dataset pan-cancer detection: Correlating cell-free DNA fragment coverage with open chromatin sites across cell types 95%
- Single cell transcriptomics of human epidermis reveals basal stem cell transition states 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- De novo detection of somatic variants in high-quality long-read single-cell RNA sequencing data 96%
- Somatic structural variant formation is guided by and influences genome architecture 95%
- Nanopore sequencing of 1000 Genomes Project samples to build a comprehensive catalog of human genetic variation 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A pan-cancer landscape of somatic substitutions in non-unique regions of the human genome 95%
- Alleloscope: Integrative single cell analysis of allele-specific copy number alterations and chromatin accessibility in cancer 94%
- Reconstruction of Contemporary Human Stem Cell Dynamics with Oscillatory Molecular Clocks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- BASCULE: Bayesian inference and clustering of mutational signatures leveraging biological priors 94%
- Machine-learning analysis of factors that shape cancer aneuploidy landscapes reveals an important role for negative selection 94%
- Disruption of metazoan gene regulatory networks in cancer alters the balance of co-expression between genes of unicellular and multicellular origins 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.