Back

Herbivores and pathogens can modulate plant population responses to future climate conditions

Andrzejak, M.; Knight, T.; Korell, L.

2026-07-08 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.07.736959 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change is expected to alter plant populations not only through direct environmental shifts but also via changes in biotic interactions, such as with herbivores and pathogens. As plant species are also expected to differ in their responses to both climate and antagonists, plant responses to both factors are expected to be variable and species-specific. To assess whether interactive effects of climate and antagonists on plant population dynamics are common and whether the strength and direction of plant responses vary across species, we conducted a multi-year field experiment that manipulated realistic climate change and experimentally reduced insect herbivores and fungal pathogens. We measured responses of plant vital rates, such as survivorship, growth, and reproduction across six grassland species. Using Integral Projection Models (IPMs) and Life Table Response Experiments (LTREs), we quantified changes in population growth rate across experimental treatments and the contribution of each vital rate to that observed change. Two of the study species declined so drastically over the course of the experiment that demographic quantification of population growth rates was not possible. From the remaining species, Bromus erectus and Plantago lanceolata show significant interactive responses of climate and antagonist reduction on population growth rates. In contrast, Dianthus carthusianorum and Tragopogon orientalis showed limited responses to experimental treatments. Notably, our results indicate that in some species biotic interactions may amplify the effects of climate change: the presence of plant antagonists exacerbates the negative effects of the future climate treatment on plant population dynamics. Our findings highlight the complexity in predicting plant population responses to climate change and provide insights for grassland management under future environmental conditions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
4
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
5
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
8
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.3%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.0%
15
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
16
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
19
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.0%
21
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%