Back

CD117 epitope-shielded hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with toxin-free conditioning and in vivo selection ameliorates β-thalassemia model

Marone, R.; Lepore, R.; Paschoudi, K.; Zuin, J.; Sinopoli, A.; Camus, A.; Burgold, T.; Bartoszek, E.; Calabrese, D.; Toranelli, M.; Wittwer, J.; Rhiel, M.; Andrieux, G.; Li, C.; Hsu, A.; Wiederkehr, A.; Wellinger, L. C.; Grossjohann, E.-M.; Ten Buren, E.; Brault, J.; Garcia Prat, L.; Lehmann, F.; Do Sacramento, V.; Christopher Divsalar, C.; Yumlu, S.; Liu, D. R.; Lieber, A.; Cathomen, T.; Cornu, T. I.; Yannaki, E.; Stefanie Urlinger, S.; Jeker, L. T.

2026-07-08 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.07.736903 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clinical evidence demonstrates that ex vivo gene therapy and genome engineering of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) could represent one-time cures. However, while genome editing itself has become increasingly efficient and precise, the toxic conditioning required for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains a major barrier to broad clinical implementation of these otherwise curative therapies. In particular, the use of busulfan for myeloablative conditioning constitutes a major safety concern. While preclinical studies established CD117 as a promising target for antigen-specific therapy, clinical translation faced setbacks balancing efficacy and safety. To overcome current limitations, we generated a new CD117-blocking monoclonal antibody (CIM058) and demonstrate its potency to block wild-type HSPCs. To enable long-term blockade of host HSPCs even after transplantation, we used prime editing to engineer CIM058-resistant human CD34+ HSPCs. When combined, CIM058 and the epitope engineered CD34+ HSPCs ameliorated disease phenotype in a {beta}-thalassemia model. Our results suggest that this approach may overcome the reliance on busulfan or other myeloablative conditioning regimens with their associated morbidities, and by enabling toxin-free conditioning and in vivo selection of edited cells, may facilitate clinical implementation of these highly valuable genetic therapies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.5%
2
Experimental Hematology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
3
Cytotherapy
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.3%
6
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
7
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
8
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
10
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Haematologica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
17
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
18
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
20
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
22
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%