Back

Machine learning guided cell-free expression maps the biochemical landscape of carbonic anhydrase

Lazar, J. T.; Komp, E.; Martinez, I.; Zolkin, K.; Notin, P. M.; Saleh, S.; Landwehr, G.; Kim, K.; Tian, A.; Shapero, B.; Karim, A. S.; Marks, D.; Beckham, G. T.; Jewett, M. C.

2026-07-08 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.07.07.736810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Carbonic anhydrases are among the fastest known biocatalysts, reversibly facilitating the hydration of CO2 to HCO3- at rates up to 107 s-1, which warrants their investigation for industrial carbon capture technologies. However, engineering carbonic anhydrases to maintain stability under harsh industrial process conditions remains a key challenge, and sequence-to-function datasets compatible with machine learning to inform forward engineering are lacking. Here, we developed a high-throughput platform that couples cell-free gene expression with a gaseous CO2 colorimetric assay to map the fitness landscapes of carbonic anhydrases. From 96 diverse natural homologs, we identified a robust variant from the Aquificota phylum and conducted an exhaustive mutational scan and functional assessment of this enzyme at 70C and 90C, covering >99% of all single-amino acid substitutions (totaling 4,365 mutations assayed in 39,285 reactions). This biochemical landscape was used to benchmark 22 zero-shot protein fitness models and identify critical mutations that improved enzyme stability at 90C by more than three-fold. We then used both zero-shot protein language models and supervised learning to filter 419 model-generated variants from a ProteinMPNN library of 100,000 sequences, leading to a best-in-class enzyme that retained activity after incubation at 95C. This work demonstrates that integrating cell-free enzyme engineering with machine learning enables opportunities for high-throughput experimental measurements to benchmark and improve protein language models, accelerate design loops, and expand functional exploration within protein families where experimental information is limited.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.5%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 7%
19.0%
3
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Chemical Biology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
6
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
7
Synthetic Biology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
ACS Catalysis
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
10
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
Metabolic Engineering Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
14
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.2%
17
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Microbial Cell Factories
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Nature Chemistry
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%