Back

Regulated apoptosis is a conserved mechanism pausing female reproduction and establishes the sterile worker caste in the eusocial wasp, Polistes

Miller, L. E.; McVerry, E. S.; O'Donnell, S.; Lenhart, K. F.

2026-07-08 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.07.07.732837 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Female reproduction is an energetically expensive process, so species evolve to balance survival with reproductive output. Many female organisms can temporarily pause their reproduction, including egg development, in response to physiological stress. The cellular mechanisms initiating and maintaining a stress-induced pause in oogenesis have been most extensively studied in Drosophila melanogaster. While the molecular control of paused oogenesis in response to starvation have been well characterized in flies, it remains unknown if these mechanisms are shared by other species with regulated pauses in oogenesis. Eusocial insects are characterized by a reproductive division of labor, with colonies of reproductive queens and sterile female workers. The social paper wasp, Polistes, has a dynamic dominance-based hierarchy for queen status. Worker Polistes are kept sterile by a combination of social and nutritional stressors. Here, we establish Polistes as a model to explore adult female reproductive plasticity. Through immunohistochemistry we have directly compared the Drosophila and Polistes ovarian structure and identified critical regions of the ovary in wasps that undergo regulated cell elimination during reproductive pause in flies. By comparing tissue structure, cell organization and rates of cell death between Polistes queens and workers we identified apoptosis as a key regulator maintaining worker sterility. Critically, this mechanism appears to be partially conserved with that in Drosophila. Finally, we find that changes in the timing and location of cell death in Polistes workers implicate oocyte identity and oocyte growth as additional potential regulators of temporary disruption of oogenesis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.8%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 7%
12.5%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.7%
5
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
7
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 12%
3.1%
10
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.3%
11
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
15
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
EvoDevo
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
21
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
23
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%