Back

Cell-type-specific polygenic risk scores reveal adipocyte-related interactions with lipids in coronary artery disease

Hu, J.; Xu, L.; Liu, T.; Zheng, W.; Zhao, H.-y.

2026-07-09 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357510 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Genome-wide polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for coronary artery disease (CAD) aggregate genetic effects across the genome and may obscure biologically distinct mechanisms. We aimed to develop cell-type-specific PRSs (csPRSs) using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data and investigate their interactions with lipids on CAD risk. Methods: Using publicly available scRNA-seq data from human heart tissue, we identified cell-type-specific genes across 13 major cell types and 64 subpopulations and grouped them into 10 cell clusters. Variants from a CAD genome-wide association study (GWAS) were mapped to cluster-specific genes to construct csPRSs for European-ancestry participants from the UK Biobank (UKB). Interactions between csPRSs and lipid-related phenotypes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models and stratified analyses, with significant findings further assessed in an internal validation dataset. Results: Distinct interaction patterns with lipid phenotypes were observed across csPRSs. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-related lipid traits, including apolipoprotein B (ApoB), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and total cholesterol (cholesterol), primarily interacted with adipocytes (Adip), whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) traits interacted with endothelial-mesothelial (EC-Meso), fibroblast (FB), and immune-cell csPRSs. Notably, interactions for Adip csPRSs were replicated in internal validation analyses. Conclusions: Cell-type-specific decomposition of genome-wide PRSs for CAD identified biologically distinct lipid interactions that were not captured by the genome-wide PRS. Adipocyte genetic factors may influence how LDL lipids affect CAD risk. These findings highlight the potential of cell-type-informed PRSs to improve the biological interpretation of PRSs and provide insights into the heterogeneous mechanisms underlying CAD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.7%
3
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.3%
5
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
6
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
11
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
12
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.3%
14
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
15
Metabolism
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.5%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
20
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
26
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Human Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%