Effect of brewers' yeast or beta-glucan derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on breast milk supply following preterm birth: The BLOOM randomised controlled trial
Grzeskowiak, L. E.; Williams, L.; Rumbold, A. R.; Simpson, B.; Kam, R. L.; Yelland, L. N.; Dansie, K.; Ingman, W.; Keir, A.; Martinello, K.; Amir, L. H.
Show abstract
Objective: Breast milk is the optimal source of nutrition for preterm infants, however, low breast milk production is common following a preterm birth. This study aimed to determine if taking brewers yeast' or beta-glucan improves daily expressed breast milk volume. Design: Randomised, blinded, parallel, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Three Australian tertiary level neonatal units. Patients: Mothers with a singleton or twin pregnancy who gave birth at less than 34 weeks' gestation. Interventions: Mothers were randomised within 72 hours of birth into three parallel groups in 1:1:1 ratio to receive either brewers' yeast, beta-glucan or placebo capsules for seven days. Main outcome measure: Total expressed breast milk volume over a 24-hour period on day seven of intervention. Results: A total of 105 mothers underwent randomisation between August 2022 and April 2024 (36 brewers' yeast, 35 beta-glucan, and 34 placebo). The adjusted mean difference in daily expressed breast milk volume was 94 mL/day (95% CI -51 to 239 mL/day) between the brewers' yeast and placebo groups, and -25 mL/day (95% CI -173 to 123 mL/day) between the beta-glucan and placebo groups. Maternal side effects were similar across groups. Conclusion: We found no clear effect of short-term administration of brewers' yeast or beta-glucan on breast-milk production following preterm birth; both interventions were well tolerated. Given the small sample size, these findings do not rule out the possibility of a clinically meaningful benefit of brewers' yeast and suggest further research with a larger sample size may be warranted to clarify the potential clinical impact. Trial registration number ACTRN12622000968774.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Are probiotics and prebiotics safe for use during pregnancy and lactation? A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Effects of a novel infant formula on weight gain and body composition of infants: The INNOVA 2020 study 93%
- The impact of antenatal balanced plate nutrition education for pregnant women on birth weight: a cluster randomised controlled trial in rural Bangladesh 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Effect of Prebiotics on the Gut Microbiome Profile and β-cell Function in Youth with Newly-Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
- Does in utero HIV-exposure and the early nutritional environment influence infant development and immune outcomes? Findings from a pilot study in Pretoria, South Africa. 88%
- A single centre randomised, feasibility study using point-of-care (POC) testing for respiratory viruses to direct oral corticosteroids use in preschool-aged children with acute wheeze. A Protocol. 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal study of blood microbiome responses to milk reintroduction in healthy volunteers: A prospective, single-arm crossover study protocol 90%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 89%
- The IGNITE Trial: Participant Recruitment Lessons Prior to SARS-CoV-2 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of prenatal small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements on pregnancy, birth and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomized controlled trials in low- and middle-income countries 94%
- Lipid-based nutrient supplements for prevention of child undernutrition: when less may be more 93%
- Characteristics that modify the effect of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplementation on child growth: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.