Back

Predicting radiological severity of pulmonary tuberculosis in children: an assessment of the WHO-criteria and novel prediction scores on an individual participant dataset

Gupta, A.; van der Zalm, M. M.; Nguyet, M. H. T. N.; d'Elbee, M.; Dodd, P. J.; Palmer, M.; Larsson, L.; Razid, A.; Hesseling, A. C.; Dunbar, R.; Heinrich, N.; Zar, H. J.; Ntinginya, N.; Khosa, C.; Nliwasa, M.; Verghese, V. P.; Bonnet, M.; Wobudeya, E.; Nduna, B.; Moh, R.; Mwanga-Amumpere, J.; Mustapha, A.; Breton, G.; Taguebue, J.-V.; Borand, L.; Goussard, P.; Schaaf, H. S.; Morrison, J.; Marcy, O.; Seddon, J. A.; Chabala, C.; Olbrich, L.

2026-07-10 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357441 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends 4-month treatment for children with non-severe pulmonary tuberculosis, outlining eligibility criteria for settings with and without chest X-ray (CXR). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the WHO eligibility criteria in settings without CXR (WHO-criteria) and developed clinical scores to support disease classification. Methods Using data from an individual participant dataset (IPD; Decide TB) of children with confirmed/unconfirmed tuberculosis from four diagnostic studies (RaPaed-TB, Umoya, TB-Speed HIV, TB-Speed Decentralisation), we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the WHO-criteria (with/without bacteriological testing) using expert CXR interpretation as a reference. We developed two multivariable logistic regression models with (Score 1) and without (Score 2) bacteriological testing, converted coefficients into integer scores with a threshold of >10 corresponding to a sensitivity [≥]70%. Results Of 2,383 children in the Decide TB-IPD, 633 (26.6%) met the eligibility criteria for a 4-month regimen, of whom 116 (18.3%) had radiologically severe disease. With and without bacteriological testing, the WHO-criteria had sensitivities of 30.1% (95%CI: 20.3%-40.2%) and 21.7% (95%CI: 10.4%-34.5%), and specificities of 83.4% (95%CI: 80.2%-86.4%) and 81.9% (95%CI: 78.8%-84.9%), respectively. Score 1 and Score 2 had sensitivities of 41.1% (95%CI: 32.4%-49.5%) and 30.9% (95%CI: 22.6%-40.4%), and specificities of 77.3% (95%CI: 73.6%-80.8%) and 83.0% (95%CI: 79.5%-86.3%) respectively. Using WHO-criteria, 91/116 (78.4%) and 105/116 (90.5%) of children were at risk of undertreatment, compared to 68/116 (58.6%) and 80/116 (68.9%) when using developed scores. Conclusions Developed scores demonstrated better sensitivity than WHO-criteria, however, performance remains suboptimal. Implementing shorter antituberculosis regimens without CXR remains challenging in children.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.5%
2
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
3
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
4
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
6
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
12
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
17
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
23
The Lancet Global Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
26
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%