Variability in sensory processing and evoked potentials in Rett syndrome
Kranz, D.; Szilagyi, K.; Sabol, K. N.; Lieberman, D.; Nelson, C. A.; Levin, A. R.; Fagiolini, M.
Show abstract
Background: Rett syndrome (RTT), a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused primarily by pathogenic variants in the MECP2 gene, is characterized by severe cognitive, motor, and autonomic impairments. Atypical sensory processing, including co-occurring hypo- and hyper-responsivity, is a core yet poorly understood feature. While evoked potentials (EPs) show delayed and attenuated sensory responses in RTT, the underlying mechanisms of these impairments remain unclear. Inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC), which quantifies trial-by-trial neural response consistency, offers a promising functional biomarker of variability in sensory processing. Methods: We characterized caregiver-reported sensory responsivity in 32 individuals with RTT (all female) and 28 typically developing controls (26 female, 2 male). EPs were then recorded during passive visual and auditory stimulation and ITPC was computed to assess whether variability in the timing of neural responses could account for reduced EP amplitudes and atypical sensory responsivity. Results: Hypo- and hyper-responsivity to sensory stimuli were both significantly elevated in RTT and were positively correlated, co-occurring within individuals. ITPC was significantly reduced in RTT across visual and auditory modalities and was associated with reduced EP amplitudes. Notably, reduced ITPC in visual-evoked potentials was further associated with elevated visual responsivity and greater behavioral symptom severity. Conclusions: Increased variability in neural response timing may contribute to both reduced EPs and atypical sensory responsivity in RTT, supporting ITPC as a functional biomarker. Decreased temporal precision of neural activity may explain the co-occurrence of hypo- and hyper-responsivity and provide a unifying framework for sensory dysfunction across neurodevelopmental disorders.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.