Back

Muscle stability deficits are strongly associated with musculoskeletal complaints in football (soccer) players: the AF-Ratio outperforms conventional strength parameters--a cross-sectional study with preliminary follow-up

Schaefer, L. V.; Bittmann, F. N.; Ulrich, J.; Prill, R.; Becker, R.

2026-07-10 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357205 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Given the high injury burden in football and the documented limitations of strength-based screening, novel approaches are warranted. Adaptive Force (AF)being closer to injury-prone movements than pushing/pulling strength--offers an alternative. This study examined the association between AF-based muscle stability and musculoskeletal complaints in football players and compared AF-derived and conventional strength parameters in their discriminative capacity, complemented by a preliminary prospective follow-up. Methods: AF and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) were measured in 23 male football players across five bilateral muscle groups (knee extensors/flexors; hip flexors/adductors/abductors). AF parameters (maximal isometric AF, maximal AF, AF-Ratio), MVIC and hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratio were compared between players with and without complaints assessed via questionnaire at baseline and six-month follow-up (n=13). Results: Stability deficits were strongly associated with complaints (OR=54.0, 82% side concordance). AF-Ratio discriminated clearly between players with and without complaints (d=-1.47), with hip abductors showing the strongest effect (d=-1.64). Players with subsequent complaints showed lower baseline AF-Ratio (d=-1.45) and more stability deficits (d=1.67). MVIC and H:Q ratio did not discriminate (p>0.430). Conclusion: The findings suggest that muscle stability assessment outperforms conventional strength parameters in discriminating players with and without complaints, with preliminary follow-up data providing tentative support for predictive value. The concept of functional instability syndrome (FIS) provides a mechanistic framework for non-contact injuries and musculoskeletal complaints. AF assessment offers potential for screening, including return-to-sport decisions. Further studies are needed to verify the results, investigate predictive value, and evaluate whether personalised stability-based interventions can reduce injury incidence.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.