Back

Muscle stability deficits are strongly associated with musculoskeletal complaints in football (soccer) players: the AF-Ratio outperforms conventional strength parameters--a cross-sectional study with preliminary follow-up

Schaefer, L. V.; Bittmann, F. N.; Ulrich, J.; Prill, R.; Becker, R.

2026-07-10 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357205 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Given the high injury burden in football and the documented limitations of strength-based screening, novel approaches are warranted. Adaptive Force (AF)being closer to injury-prone movements than pushing/pulling strength--offers an alternative. This study examined the association between AF-based muscle stability and musculoskeletal complaints in football players and compared AF-derived and conventional strength parameters in their discriminative capacity, complemented by a preliminary prospective follow-up. Methods: AF and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) were measured in 23 male football players across five bilateral muscle groups (knee extensors/flexors; hip flexors/adductors/abductors). AF parameters (maximal isometric AF, maximal AF, AF-Ratio), MVIC and hamstrings-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratio were compared between players with and without complaints assessed via questionnaire at baseline and six-month follow-up (n=13). Results: Stability deficits were strongly associated with complaints (OR=54.0, 82% side concordance). AF-Ratio discriminated clearly between players with and without complaints (d=-1.47), with hip abductors showing the strongest effect (d=-1.64). Players with subsequent complaints showed lower baseline AF-Ratio (d=-1.45) and more stability deficits (d=1.67). MVIC and H:Q ratio did not discriminate (p>0.430). Conclusion: The findings suggest that muscle stability assessment outperforms conventional strength parameters in discriminating players with and without complaints, with preliminary follow-up data providing tentative support for predictive value. The concept of functional instability syndrome (FIS) provides a mechanistic framework for non-contact injuries and musculoskeletal complaints. AF assessment offers potential for screening, including return-to-sport decisions. Further studies are needed to verify the results, investigate predictive value, and evaluate whether personalised stability-based interventions can reduce injury incidence.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
27.7%
2
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.5%
3
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
14
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
19
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
20
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
21
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%