Back

Assessment of Perioperative Biomedical Equipment Availability, Functionality, and Management Practices Across Rwanda: A Cross-sectional Observational Study.

Fofanah, T.; Temesgen, W. B.; Berhe, D. F.; Mukundwa, P. N.; Belachew, A. G.; Gemechu, N. B.; Murithi, G.; Mukanahayo, E.; Bitew, A. A.; Ndizeye, A.; Turc, R.; Alemu, S. B.; Ntihumbya, J. B.; Bekele, A.; Rice, H. E.; Alayande, B.

2026-07-10 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357184 medRxiv
Show abstract

Effective management of biomedical equipment prevents breakdowns, extends equipment lifespan, ensures perioperative safety and cost-efficiency. There are major challenges in managing biomedical equipment, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the availability, functionality, and adherence to maintenance practices of biomedical equipment in operating rooms (ORs) and post-anaesthesia care units (PACUs) across Rwanda. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted at one Level 2 district hospital in each of Rwanda's five provinces (n=5 sites). Data were collected using three main tools: 1) a medical equipment checklist, 2) a checklist for hospital biomedical management, and 3) direct inspections of selected biomedical equipment. All tools underwent pretesting and face validation with support from biomedical experts prior to data collection in May 2024. Key measures, including the availability and functionality of biomedical equipment, and adherence to maintenance and management practices, were summarised using descriptive statistics. The five hospitals had a total of 16 ORs, 4 PACUs, and 226 pieces of equipment. The overall availability of biomedical equipment was 45%, and the functionality of the available equipment was 96%. The mean adherence rate to national management practices was 66%. The Rwandan government, non-governmental organisations, and hospitals were identified as direct funders of the equipment, accounting for 42%, 12%, and 4%, respectively. However, 42% of the equipment surveyed could not be linked to any of the above sources of acquisition. Among non-functional equipment, 75% was due to a lack of spare parts, while 25% was due to a lack of skills to maintain the equipment. In summary, we found low availability of perioperative biomedical equipment across Rwanda, although the available equipment was highly functional. Adherence to national management practice guidelines was relatively low, threatening the sustainability of functional equipment. We recommend that the government and hospital administrators implement robust, regular auditing systems to ensure proper management of biomedical equipment.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.7%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.4%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 1%
13.4%
4
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
7
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
BMC Medical Education
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Health Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
25
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
28
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
Emergency Medicine Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%