HIV as a Host Susceptibility State for Severe Drug Hypersensitivity: Disentangling Biological Susceptibility from Drug Exposure in the FAERS Database
Mukherjee, E. M.; Park, D.; Asiaee, A.; Krantz, M. S.; Stone, C. A.; Martin-Pozo, M. D.; Phillips, E. J.
Show abstract
Background: HIV infection has long been associated with increased incidence of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR). It remains unknown whether this increased incidence is a direct biological result of HIV infection, differences in drug exposure, or other demographic factors. Objective: To evaluate the association between HIV and SCAR and determine whether this relationship persists after adjusting for demographic factors and structured drug exposure. Methods: We analyzed reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2013-2023. SCAR outcomes included Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE). HIV status was determined using antiretroviral exposure, indication text, and machine-learning imputation. Logistic regression models were constructed sequentially: unadjusted, demographic-adjusted, and fully adjusted with drug principal components to account for polypharmacy. Drug-level disproportionality and HIV-drug interaction analyses were also performed. Results: In unadjusted models, HIV was strongly associated with SCAR (OR ~2.0-2.7). Adjustment for demographics attenuated this association, and further adjustment for drug exposure reduced the effect to near null for overall SCAR and DRESS. A modest residual association persisted for SJS/TEN (OR ~1.3). Disproportionality analyses demonstrated enrichment of specific high-risk drugs in PLWH. Interaction modeling revealed drug-specific amplification of SCAR risk in HIV, notably for carbamazepine and clarithromycin, whereas other drugs showed minimal interaction. Conclusion: The association between HIV and SCAR is largely explained by differences in drug exposure and demographic factors. Residual risk is drug-specific rather than uniform, supporting a model in which HIV modifies susceptibility to select drug triggers rather than acting as a global risk factor. Further prospective and retrospective studies are required to quantify associations.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Biphasic Decay of Intact and Defective HIV DNA Reservoir During Acute Treated HIV Disease 94%
- Influence of the broadly neutralizing antibody VRC01 on HIV breakthrough virus populations in antibody-mediated prevention trials 93%
- Non-Invasive Plasma Glycomic and Metabolic Biomarkers of Post-treatment Control of HIV 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based combination antiretroviral therapy is associated with lower cell-associated HIV RNA and DNA levels as compared with therapy based on protease inhibitors 93%
- Doubling dolutegravir dosage reduces the viral reservoir in ART-treated people with HIV 93%
- Persistence of intact HIV-1 proviruses in the brain during antiretroviral therapy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of severe illness after post-vaccination COVID-19 breakthrough among adults with and without HIV in the United States 92%
- Trajectory of viral load in a prospective population-based cohort with incident SARS-CoV-2 G614 infection 91%
- COVID-19 infections post-vaccination by HIV status in the United States 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antiviral efficacy of fluoxetine in early symptomatic COVID-19: an open-label, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial (PLATCOV) 92%
- Early treatment with nitazoxanide prevents worsening of mild and moderate COVID-19 and subsequent hospitalization 90%
- Effectiveness of Rosuvastatin plus Colchicine, Emtricitabine/Tenofovir and a combination of them in Hospitalized Patients with SARS Covid-19 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.