Back

HIV as a Host Susceptibility State for Severe Drug Hypersensitivity: Disentangling Biological Susceptibility from Drug Exposure in the FAERS Database

Mukherjee, E. M.; Park, D.; Asiaee, A.; Krantz, M. S.; Stone, C. A.; Martin-Pozo, M. D.; Phillips, E. J.

2026-07-09 dermatology
10.64898/2026.07.07.26356279 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: HIV infection has long been associated with increased incidence of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR). It remains unknown whether this increased incidence is a direct biological result of HIV infection, differences in drug exposure, or other demographic factors. Objective: To evaluate the association between HIV and SCAR and determine whether this relationship persists after adjusting for demographic factors and structured drug exposure. Methods: We analyzed reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2013-2023. SCAR outcomes included Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE). HIV status was determined using antiretroviral exposure, indication text, and machine-learning imputation. Logistic regression models were constructed sequentially: unadjusted, demographic-adjusted, and fully adjusted with drug principal components to account for polypharmacy. Drug-level disproportionality and HIV-drug interaction analyses were also performed. Results: In unadjusted models, HIV was strongly associated with SCAR (OR ~2.0-2.7). Adjustment for demographics attenuated this association, and further adjustment for drug exposure reduced the effect to near null for overall SCAR and DRESS. A modest residual association persisted for SJS/TEN (OR ~1.3). Disproportionality analyses demonstrated enrichment of specific high-risk drugs in PLWH. Interaction modeling revealed drug-specific amplification of SCAR risk in HIV, notably for carbamazepine and clarithromycin, whereas other drugs showed minimal interaction. Conclusion: The association between HIV and SCAR is largely explained by differences in drug exposure and demographic factors. Residual risk is drug-specific rather than uniform, supporting a model in which HIV modifies susceptibility to select drug triggers rather than acting as a global risk factor. Further prospective and retrospective studies are required to quantify associations.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
2
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.5%
5
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
6
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
9
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
13
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
24
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
25
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
26
JID Innovations
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
27
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
28
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
29
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
30
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.0%