Allosteric Gating Mechanism Regulates Odorant Selectivity and Antagonism in Odorant Receptors
Ma, N.; Marie, M.; Takase, D.; del Torrent Masachs, C. L.; Aguilar, J.; Manglik, A.; Matsunami, H.; Vaidehi, N.
Show abstract
Odorant receptors (ORs) belong to class A G protein coupled receptors that detect diverse small molecules, yet the steps that link odorant association to receptor mediated selectivity remains incompletely defined. Here we combined 1.26 milliseconds of all-atom odorant association Molecular Dynamics simulations with Markov state modeling and cell-based cAMP measurements to examine two human ORs receptors that recognize chemically distinct odorants. In the class I receptor OR51E2, propionate associates via two extracellular pathways gated for selectivity by residues in the extracellular loop 2 and 3. The longer alkyl chain heptanoate occupies this gate and reduces propionate association and signaling which is consistent with the observed antagonist behavior of heptanoate. Pocket-expanding mutations at F155 and L158 allosterically regulate ECL2-ECL3 gate by permitting longer-chain fatty acids to adopt fully inserted poses that support gate closure, while also attenuating propionate responses. In the class II receptor OR1A1, hydrophobic odorants partition into the membrane and reach the orthosteric site mostly through multiple transmembrane paths. A mutational scan of gating residues and analysis of intermediate-state occupancies suggest that an orthosteric substitution at G108 can allosterically bias odorant association path choice. Together, these results support a model in which odorant association paths and gate residence, together with allosteric coupling between the orthosteric site and entry gates, contribute to odorant specificity and antagonism in odorant receptors.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.