Back

Reverse genetics and comparative pathogenesis of Lone star virus.

Omoga, D. C. A.; Witt, C.; Giesel, H.; Bowen, J. M.; Gunter, K.; Pozuelos, S.; Relich, R.; Brennan, B.; Tilston-Lunel, N. L.

2026-07-07 microbiology
10.64898/2026.07.06.736858 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lone star virus (LSV) is a bandavirus first isolated from Amblyomma americanum ticks in the United States (U.S.) and is phylogenetically related to severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus (SFTSV), Heartland virus (HRTV), and Bhanja virus, each of which has been associated with severe human disease. In contrast to these better-characterized bandaviruses, LSV remains poorly studied, and its pathogenic potential is not well defined. Recent detection of LSV RNA in cerebrospinal fluid from an immunocompromised patient in Idaho, U.S., with fatal meningoencephalitis further highlights the need for experimental systems to investigate LSV biology. Here, we rescued recombinant (r) LSV from cloned cDNA and used it to characterize LSV. rLSV replicated similarly to the parental isolate in mammalian cells and caused rapid, systemic, and lethal disease in IFNAR-/- mice, with widespread detection of viral (v) RNA across multiple tissues, hepatic and splenic pathology, and induction of inflammatory cytokines. In contrast, C57BL/6J mice controlled infection and exhibited no clinical disease. To place LSV within a broader comparative framework, we generated rSFTSV from cloned cDNA and compared rLSV, rSFTSV, and HRTV in cell culture and IFNAR-/- mice. Our studies revealed distinct disease kinetics among these related tick-borne bandaviruses and showed that HRTV-induced immunity protected against homologous HRTV rechallenge and heterologous rSFTSV challenge, but not rLSV challenge. Together, these findings establish reverse-genetics platforms and small-animal models for comparative bandavirus studies, define key features of LSV pathogenesis, and place this neglected virus within a framework of related bandaviruses that differ in virulence and immunological overlap.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Virology
499 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
18.1%
2
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.7%
4
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 8%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
7
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
8
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
Journal of General Virology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
13
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
15
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Virology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
17
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
18
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
20
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Virology Journal
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%