Back

Application of the Bradley-Terry model to quantify components of sperm competition

Afkhami, M.; Li, M. L.; Liang, C.; Patel, P. H.; Buehner, N. A.; Wolfner, M. F.; Clark, A. G.

2026-07-10 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.07.06.736847 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In many species with female sperm storage, ejaculates from multiple males overlap in the female reproductive tract, making sperm competitive ability a key component of male reproductive fitness and a target of rapid evolutionary change in the underlying genes. Here, we used controlled laboratory assays of Drosophila melanogaster sperm competition, with doubly-mated females and paternity assignment of offspring, to ask whether a Bradley-Terry framework can effectively summarize and predict competitive outcomes. The Bradley-Terry model is a probabilistic approach that estimates a latent "ability" score for each contestant based on outcomes of pairwise contests, and thus is naturally suited to data from sperm competition, which are intrinsically pairwise. We selected five distinct male genotypes: four carried strongly expressed RFP or GFP markers that allowed us to distinguish their heterozygous offspring under UV illumination, and the fifth was Canton-S, a standard wild-type genotype that served as our reference. Using Canton-S females, we assayed all 20 ordered pairwise combinations of first and second male, recorded successful double matings, and quantified the offspring sired by each male. We then extended the Bradley-Terry model to estimate genotype-specific competitive success separately for first-male "defense" (fertilization success following initial mating, also called "P1") and second-male "offense" (fertilization success following a remating, also called "P2"). This framework provides a flexible and efficient way to integrate results across large arrays of pairwise mating tests and to derive predictive scores for sperm competitive performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.9%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 6%
12.8%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
7.2%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
7
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.8%
8
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
9
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
10
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
12
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
17
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
21
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
24
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%