Back

The interplay between detection and localization in human vision

Coupette, F.; Brainard, D. H.; Smithson, H. E.; Read, D. J.

2026-07-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.06.736811 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fixational eye movements (FEMs) comprise the involuntary small scale eye motion conducted during fixation on a stationary stimulus. As a consequence, the visual information can be spread across multiple photoreceptors reducing the local signal-to-noise ratio. Yet, the signals transmitted by individual photoreceptors adapt to constant stimulation so that an entirely still scene would eventually fade from view. Because FEMs convert a stationary stimulus in the world to a temporally varying one on the retina, they can act to prevent this stimulus fading. Thus, FEMs can be understood as a sampling protocol than needs to be adjusted to the underlying processing circuitry. We analyse the impact of FEMs on the rate of information acquisition at the level of the retina for two common tasks of the human eye that typically go hand in hand: detection and localization. Here, we build a simple analytical model of visual perception, i.e. we subject a continuous receptor array to a stimulus moving across the retina as a consequence of FEMs with receptor excitations depending on past stimulation through a linear response function. Using Bayesian inference we quantify both the probability of detection and the accuracy of localization as a function of parameters controlling eye movements and stimulus. We find that localization of a stimulus is equivalent to the detection of the stimulus gradient. This allows us to discern optimal properties of eye movements for the respective tasks and provides a link between two typical psychophysical observables: detection thresholds and Vernier acuity. Our analysis suggests that typical human FEMs tend to facilitate localization at the expense of detection. Simply put, if you can see a stimulus you also know where it is. Finally, we propose a variety of experimental protocols to investigate the interplay between FEMs, detection, and localization with the potential of inferring intrinsic properties of an individuals visual system.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.8%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.8%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
7.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
6
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.8%
9
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
10
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.5%
16
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.3%
18
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
20
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
23
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
28
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%