Back

Structural connectivity of auditory-linguistic brain networks predicts success in speech categorization and listening in noise

Rizzi, R.; Stirn, J. R.; Eisenhut, Z.; Bidelman, G. M.

2026-07-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.06.736789 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Successful speech perception requires listeners to bin continuous acoustic information into discrete phonetic categories. However, some people maintain within-category acoustic information (gradient) while others discard category-irrelevant information (discrete) during perception. Listeners also vary in how consistently they label speech sounds and more gradient/consistent labeling has been linked with better speech-in-noise (SIN) perception. Here, we test how neuroanatomical properties of the brain's major speech-language and auditory pathways relate to individual differences in speech categorization and SIN processing. We measured phonetic categorization and SIN comprehension via phoneme labeling and QuickSIN tasks. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with probabilistic tractography estimated axonal density within the bilateral arcuate fasciculi and brainstem-cortical auditory projections. Anatomical morphology (surface area, gray matter volume, thickness) was also quantified in the adjacent frontotemporal cortical areas and midbrain. Behaviorally, we found more consistent categorizers had better performance on the QuickSIN. DWI showed that more gradient listeners had greater white matter density in the left arcuate fasciculus and brainstem-cortical auditory pathways, while better SIN performance was predicted by denser white matter in the brainstem-cortical auditory pathways. Morphometric results revealed more consistent listening was associated with greater cortical thickness in right superior temporal gyrus and more gradient listening was associated with greater surface area in right pars opercularis. We infer that individual differences in phonetic categorization relate to SIN comprehension and are at least partially explained by neuroanatomical properties of the auditory-linguistic brain.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
18.4%
2
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.7%
5
Neurobiology of Language
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 13%
4.0%
10
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
12
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
18
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
20
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%