Back

Mineral geochemistry and mycorrhizal allocation define root architectural strategy during early vascular plant colonization

Zaharescu, D. G.

2026-07-07 plant biology
10.64898/2026.07.06.736658 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The emergence of vascular plants on land is one of evolution greatest triumphs. This success was contingent on the capacity of roots and their symbionts to acquire resources from exposed geology. However, how rock chemistry shapes plant root architectural strategies, and their return on investment during early ecosystem colonization remains poorly understood. Here we use a two-year mesocosm experiment with Bouteloua dactyloides grass and an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiont, grown on four mineral substrates of contrasting composition, to show that rock geochemistry predictably determines root topological strategy, from herringbone architecture on nutrient-poor granite to dichotomous-like branching on nutrient-rich basalt. Substrate identity governed investment allocation between root complexity and biomass, with plants consolidating existing transport pathways as weathering-derived nutrients subsided. Traits associated with exploratory effort were generally decoupled from those related to biomass buildup. In basalt and rhyolite plants preferentially invested in complexity, generating the largest numbers of prospective tips for mining and biomass buildup; in granite, plants chose a surviving strategy, limiting branching to preserve biomass; while in schist, plants balanced biomass with complexity, extending growth on low investment, which increased tissue density. Surprisingly, mycorrhizal fungi did not alter the whole root system size, but reallocated investment between specific root orders, discouraging investment in embryonic roots in some substrates, and stimulating lateral expansion of the rooting system in others. This extends the functional balance mechanism from plant to the plant-fungus system. The extensive phenotypic plasticity of the root-mycorrhiza system shown here provides an evolutionary space for natural selection, which must have played a crucial role in the success of plants on land in the past, and is crucial for understanding plant ecological dynamics today.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.2%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 8%
11.7%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.6%
4
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.7%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
7
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
8
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
11
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
13
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
15
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
22
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%