Back

Data-driven oscillatory network modeling with condition-dependent coupling laws: Identifying directed neural interactions in working memory attention dynamics

Ohkawa, M.; Zhou, Y. J.; Haegens, S.; Jafarian, M.

2026-07-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.06.736523 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Learning new information in the presence of distracters and changing conditions requires the ability to adapt. In the brain, this adaptive capability has been linked to dynamic interactions between attention and working memory, which enable the selective filtering of irrelevant input while preserving behaviorally relevant information. Specific neural oscillations have been implicated in this process. Here, we introduce a phenomenological data-driven framework for oscillatory network modeling that learns condition-dependent coupling laws directly from neural recordings and enables inference of condition-dependent directed pathways. We apply our approach to magnetoen-cephalography (MEG) data collected while participants performed a working-memory task with and without distracters. Recall dynamics in the non-distracter condition are first modeled using a linear oscillatory network in which each region of interest is represented by two alpha-band harmonic oscillators. We use universal differential equations (UDE), an extension of neural differential equations, to capture distracter-induced changes in coupling laws. Symbolic regression is then used to interpret the modifications identified by UDE as nonlinear functions, and an additional method is proposed to identify the directed pathway from the newly emerging nonlinear terms in the dynamics of brain regions of interest. Despite inter-subject variability, working memory recall data from all four participants examined under distraction showed the emergence of a pathway from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) to the primary visual cortex (V1). This finding is consistent with the established role of the dlPFC in cognitive control and suggests that distracter processing recruits a directed interaction from prefrontal to visual regions. More broadly, our results illustrate that combining linear models whose parameters are learned from the data with universal differential equations augmented by interpretability methods enables the identification of condition-dependent coupling laws, their representation as interpretable mathematical functions, and the discovery of candidate directed pathways underlying adaptive changes in oscillatory networks without requiring strong prior assumptions about the underlying mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.5%
3
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
5
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
7
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
10
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
14
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
15
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
17
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.7%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
27
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
28
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
30
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%