Back

Molecular residual disease detection by serial tumour-informed circulating tumour DNA analysis in resectable oesophageal & gastroesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma: a prospective UK multi-centre study

Coles, H. R.; Freeman, A.; Jacobson, D. H.; Devonshire, G.; Grehan, N.; Millington, C.; Nutzinger, B.; Harvey, A.; Saunders, J. H.; Gossage, J.; Ma, R.; Mason, L.; Parsons, S. L.; Askinyte, V.; Massia, S.; Fitzgerald, R. C.; Jones, C. M.

2026-07-09 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.06.26357371 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The value and optimal timing of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis in locally advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is uncertain. We hypothesised that perioperative detection would predict event-free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival, and that 3-6 months post-operative detection would predict recurrence. Methods In this prospective multi-centre cohort study, tumour-informed ctDNA assays were designed for 49 patients using whole-exome sequencing. Bloods were collected for ctDNA detection up to 8 days prior to surgery, and at 3-6 weeks and 3-6 months post-surgery, then correlated with clinicopathological characteristics, EFS and OS. Results Pre- and early post- surgery ctDNA positivity were associated with worse EFS (HRs 7.97 (95% confidence interval, CI 2.64-24.04), p<0.0001; 8.18 (95%CI 3.23-20.69), p<0.0001) and OS (HRs 7.82 (95%CI 2.22-27.54), p=0.00018; 13.69 (95%CI 4.52-41.49), p<0.0001). In pre-surgery positive patients, post-surgery ctDNA clearance associated with improved EFS and OS, and predicted better OS in those with a poor histopathological response to neoadjuvant treatment. 3-6 month ctDNA-positivity preceded standard-of-care recurrence detection by median 53.5 (interquartile range 39.3-200.0) days. Conclusions Perioperative ctDNA positivity associates with worse EFS and OS in OAC, identifying a subgroup with improved outcomes despite adverse pathological features. ctDNA testing at 3-6 months predicts recurrence earlier than standard-of-care surveillance.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.