Back

Clinically relevant variability of the lipidome in people with type 2 diabetes

Kienle, S. M.; Suvitaival, T. R. L.; Blond, M. B.; de Melo, J. M. L.; Ropke, M. A.; Sulek, K.; Stoerling, J.; Rossing, P.; Legido-Quigley, C.

2026-07-09 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.07.06.26357365 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Besides hyperglycemia, type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by dyslipidemia, which is typically assessed using traditional clinical lipid measurements. However, molecular plasma lipids beyond these traditional markers can provide additional information about an individuals health status. For molecular lipids to be used effectively, certain characteristics, such as their temporal variability, need to be determined. Methods We analyzed the plasma lipidome for three consecutive time points, each three months apart, of 51 individuals with T2D using targeted liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS). 513 lipid species across 25 (sub)classes were quantified by this approach and the temporal variability were calculated. Moreover, to identify sex differences in the plasma lipidome, we analyzed 914 samples of a cross-sectional T2D cohort with the same approach. Results Neutral lipids and phosphatidylserine had the highest temporal variability which was independent of their platform-specific variability. In contrast, glycosphingolipids were found to be relatively stable over time in individuals with T2D. Acyl-chain analysis revealed generally similar variability in the acyl-chain groups but indicated a higher temporal variability in medium-length acyl-chains. Lipid-sex association analysis showed markedly higher sphingomyelins, phosphatidylcholines, and phosphatidylethanolamines in women and higher acylcarnitines in men. Overall, approximately one-third of measured lipids showed significant sex differences independent of age, BMI, diabetes duration, glycemic control, and medication use. Conclusions Our findings provide insights into temporal variability of molecular lipids. This variability should be considered when assessing novel lipid biomarkers. Likewise, sex differences in these lipids need to be considered in precision medicine for diabetes management.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
2
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
7.9%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
5
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
7
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Diabetologia
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Diabetes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
11
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
14
Diabetes Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
16
Journal of the Endocrine Society
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Journal of Lipid Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%