Back

Sequential Word Properties in Verbal Fluency: Detecting High-Proficiency Cognitive Impairment

Chang, Y.-N.; Wang, Y.-H.; Chou, C.-J.; Liu, Y.-C.; Lambon Ralph, M. A.

2026-07-09 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.06.26357360 medRxiv
Show abstract

Verbal fluency (VF) tasks are widely used to differentiate patients with cognitive impairment from healthy controls, but total word count produced during these tasks becomes unreliable when patients and controls exhibit comparable proficiency. This study examined, in detail, whether item-level and sequential properties of words produced during a VF task could reliably differentiate high-proficiency patients indistinguishable from controls by word count alone. Seventy-seven native Mandarin Chinese speakers (38 controls and 39 patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia) completed a semantic VF task. Participants were subdivided by proficiency into four groups: high-proficiency controls (HC), low-proficiency controls (LC), high-proficiency patients (HP), and low-proficiency patients (LP). The LC and HP subgroups were matched on semantic fluency scores and thus provided a key focus for the investigation. We examined item-level properties (word frequency, contextual diversity, semantic diversity, surprisal) and sequential properties (positional frequency variation) of the words produced. Significant group differences emerged across item-level psycholinguistic properties, though these were primarily driven by the LP group, with no reliable differentiation between LC and HP. Crucially, positional frequency variation distinguished LC from HP. LC participants began their lists with high-frequency words followed by a systematic decline, whereas HP patients produced words within a consistently narrow frequency band throughout. These findings indicate that item-level psycholinguistic properties alone are insufficient to differentiate HP from LC, whereas sequential word frequency variation provides a potential index of cognitive impairment, reflecting underlying differences in semantic retrieval and memory organisation. Future work with larger samples is needed to validate generalisability.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
9
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
10
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
16
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
18
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
21
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%