Back

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in HFpEF: Distinguishing Drug-Specific Response from Prognostic Phenotypes Across Randomized Trials

Santana, C.; Katayama, A.; Ballal, A.; Sirish, P.; Liem, D. A.; Bidwell, J. T.; Chen, C.-Y.; Nuno, M.; Ebong, I.; Zhang, X.-D.; Izu, L.; Borlaug, B. A.; Chirinos, J. A.; Desai, A. S.; Desvigne-Nickens, P.; Givertz, M. M.; Khan, S. S.; Kitzman, D. W.; Lewis, G. D.; Rasmussen-Torvik, L. J.; Redfield, M. M.; Sachdev, V.; Shah, S. H.; Sharma, K.; Tinsley, E.; Wong, R.; Shah, S. J.; Lopez, J. E.; Chiamvimonvat, N.; Cadeiras, M.

2026-07-09 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.06.26357251 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome comprising multiple pathophysiological phenotypes. HFpEF trials have largely enrolled diverse populations and reported average treatment effects, consistently yielding neutral results that may obscure drug-specific benefits within distinct subgroups. To address this issue, we employ an interaction-based that incorporates treatment-by-variable interactions to uncover drug-specific responses. Methods: We leveraged four HFpEF clinical trials (TOPCAT, RELAX, NEAT-HFpEF, INDIE-HFpEF) and developed a framework comprising two complementary approaches. The first employed a prognostic responder model to evaluate whether conventional responder definitions reflect treatment-specific benefit or instead capture favorable clinical trajectories common to both treatment and placebo groups. The second used an interaction-based individual treatment effect (ITE) modeling to identify baseline variables that modify therapy effect, distinguishing drug-specific response from prognostic phenotypes. Results: Although the prognostic responder model demonstrated good discrimination, further analisys suggested it primarily captured a prognostic signal associated with favorable clinical trajectories common to both treatment and placebo arms. In contrast, the ITE model identified distinct, drug-specific effect modifiers across trials (cardiorenal-inflammatory for spironolactone (TOPCAT), NO-mediated anti-inflammatory for isosorbide mononitrate (NEAT-HFpEF), afterload-reducing for inorganic nitrite (INDIE-HFpEF), and anti-volume-overload for sildenafil (RELAX). Each ITE model demonstrated significance only within its own trial suggesting drug-specific signal. Conclusions: The proposed method identifies mechanism-specific effect modifiers, and uncovers clinically meaningful heterogeneity in treatment response, which is not captured by conventional MCID-based approaches. Although exploratory, these findings support phenotype-guided therapy in HFpEF and argue for phenotype-informed trial design to enhance treatment-effect detection and therapy targeting.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
2
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
15
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
18
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
26
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%