Back

Spatially informed comprehensive tumor transcriptomic profiling stratifies clinical outcomes in early triple negative breast cancer

Huraiova, B.; Gala, M.; Barroso, L.; Amylidi, A. L.; Gabrisova, D.; Gubova, S.; Ondris, T.; Javorcik, K.; Kucej, M.; Nemeth, F.; Rada, M.; Smolkova, S.; Husarcikova, E.; Matyasovska, N.; Szobi, A.; Szeibeczederova, S.; Capkovicova, A.; Ferjentsik, Z.; Hrabovska, S.; Veres, I.; Özbasak, H.; Calle, S. A.; Grell, P.; Holanek, M.; Nenutil, R.; Selingerova, I.; Cherifi, F.; Emile, G.; Rouzier, R.; Regitnig, P.; Tamussino, K.; Jerzak, K. J.; Lu, F.-I.; Shetty, S.; Comerma, L.; Albanell, J.; Servitja, S.; Andrasina, I.; Eberhard, D. A.; Papazisis, K.; Rinnerthaler, G.; Paul, E. D.; Cekan, P.

2026-07-09 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.06.26357224 medRxiv
Show abstract

The intensification of neoadjuvant therapy for early triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) - through the addition of carboplatin to standard chemotherapy and the incorporation of pembrolizumab - has markedly improved prognosis in recent years. However, this escalation carries a substantial risk of toxicity, and not all patients require the full regimen to achieve benefit. Realizing individualized treatment strategies will therefore depend on prognostic and predictive biomarkers that can forecast treatment response and long-term outcome. In the present study, we interrogated public gene expression datasets to develop transcriptomic signatures predicting response to neoadjuvant treatment and risk of recurrence. To validate these signatures, we used the Multiplex8+ platform for spatially informed comprehensive transcriptomic profiling in a real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort of 590 patients diagnosed with eTNBC and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy. The diagnostic Multiplex8+ test uses H&E and multiplexed RNA-FISH to guide the selection of specific tumor areas for the whole transcriptome sequencing and signature analysis. In the real-world cohort, the Multiplex8+ signatures were associated with both response and prognosis, remaining highly significant in multivariable models that included clinical parameters. The signatures were complementary to established biomarkers such as stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. These findings warrant prospective integration of the signatures into risk-stratified clinical trials to support future de-escalation and escalation strategies, enabling a better balance of efficacy, toxicity, cost, and drug availability.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
8
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
9
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
12
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.9%
15
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.1%
17
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
25
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
26
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%