Back

There is no silver bullet: Tiger corridors do not ensure multispecies carnivore connectivity

Rana, D.; Ramakrishnan, U.

2026-07-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.05.736645 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Connectivity is critical to sustaining endangered carnivores in speciose yet fragmented landscapes such as in the global south. Corridors to mitigate fragmentation are designed based on charismatic species or habitat-based approaches, but their multispecies effectiveness for maintaining functional connectivity remains poorly tested. We combined landscape genetic analyses across five sympatric carnivores - Panthera tigris, Panthera pardus, Prionailurus viverrinus, Felis chaus, and Melursus ursinus, to evaluate how landscape features shape functional connectivity in a globally important felid landscape. We then assessed the efficiency of existing tiger corridors and single-species surrogates for maintaining multispecies functional connectivity. Species exhibited contrasting responses to landscape variables, producing distinct resistance surfaces and connectivity corridors. Spatial similarity of connectivity between species pairs was highly variable (r = 0.14-0.93), but no single species effectively captured connectivity patterns of the broader carnivore community (maximum mean overlap of <0.7 across species). Moreover, genetically optimized corridors were at least 70% more efficient in capturing connectivity compared to existing tiger corridors, demonstrating mismatches between structural and functional connectivity. Our results highlight limitations of surrogate-based corridor planning and demonstrate that integrating multispecies functional connectivity can substantially improve conservation planning in human-dominated landscapes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
2
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.7%
9
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
10
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
11
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
23
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
29
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%