Back

PARS: an automated, open-source pipeline for subject-specific finite element head modelling from MRI

Darvishi, V.; Chan, E. Y. K.; Duckworth, H.; Parker, T. D.; Sharp, D. J.; Ghajari, M.

2026-07-06 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.05.736584 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Converting medical images into anatomically detailed, subject-specific finite element (FE) models is a long-standing bottleneck in brain computational modelling. These models are used to predict brain tissue deformation, e.g. in traumatic brain injury, particle diffusion in brain drug delivery, and other biophysical phenomena across neurological disorders. However, existing model creation workflows depend on manual image segmentation, proprietary meshing software, and labour-intensive repair of meningeal and interface structures, limiting reproducibility and cohort analysis. Here we present PARS, a fully automated, open-source pipeline that converts a T1-weighted MRI scan into a simulation-ready FE head model. PARS combines anatomical parcellation with tissue maps and uses iterative neighbourhood-based reclassification, yielding a gap-free whole-head label volume. The volume is directly converted into a hexahedral mesh, augmented with algorithmically reconstructed falx, tentorium, pia and dura mater, and refined by Laplacian smoothing under a node-locking scheme that controls element quality and the explicit-solver stable timestep. We evaluated PARS on 23 subjects spanning cranial volumes of 832 to 1,329 cubic centimeter, at 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm MRI resolutions. At 1 mm, meshes achieved a median Scaled Jacobian of 0.976, and total intracranial volume error of ~0.54; quality remained high at 1.5 mm (SJ of 0.933) and 2 mm (SJ of 0.921). Model creation runtime ranged from 9 to 38 minutes per subject. Models generated by PARS have been validated against cadaveric brain displacement data and demonstrated utility across traumatic brain injury and normal pressure hydrocephalus research. PARS provides an open-access, reproducible resource that substantially lowers the barriers to subject-specific brain modelling.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
3
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
6
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
7
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
9
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
10
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.7%
13
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
14
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
17
Neuro-Oncology Advances
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
20
Journal of Open Source Software
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
24
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%