Back

Metabolomic signatures support the diagnostics of peritoneal endometriosis using generalised linear models.

Cecil, A.; Vouk, K.; Novak Pusic, M.; Vogler, A.; Wenzl, R.; Prehn, C.; Adamski, J.; Lanisnik Rizner, T.

2026-07-07 systems biology
10.64898/2026.07.05.736551 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Endometriosis, a common inflammatory gynecological disorder affecting up to 10% of women worldwide, is characterized by the presence of endometrium-like tissue outside the uterus. Current diagnostic methods, such as ultrasound and MRI, effectively detect ovarian and deep endometriosis but fail to detect more common peritoneal type. Diagnosing peritoneal endometriosis currently necessitates invasive laparoscopy and histological confirmation. Despite numerous efforts, no new reliable biomarkers have successfully transitioned into routine clinical use. This study aimed to investigate the use of targeted metabolomics to discover metabolite ratios capable of identifying endometriosis in plasma samples. We analyzed a discovery population of 235 patients and a validation population of 278 patients. All cases and controls in both populations were diagnosed by laparoscopy. Control subjects included individuals presenting with symptoms such as pain, dysmenorrhea, infertility, or other benign conditions, but who had no laparoscopic evidence of endometriosis. Using generalized linear models (GLMs) and machine learning, the study identified specific metabolite ratios as potential biomarkers that can distinguish different types of endometriosis and enable mass spectrometry-based diagnostics for peritoneal endometriosis. The best-validated GLM, derived from the concentration ratios of amino acids, acylcarnitines, sphingomyelins, and phosphatidylcholines, consisted of Thr/SM(OH) C22:2 + PC aa C40:5/SFA_PC + lysoPC a C16:0/SM(OH) C16:1. This model yielded an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.619-0.891, with 76% sensitivity and 81% specificity) for peritoneal endometriosis. This innovative approach offers a robust diagnostic model, addressing an unmet medical need by facilitating earlier detection of peritoneal endometriosis and improving overall clinical management.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.1%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
11.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.9%
4
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
8
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
12
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
14
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
15
PROTEOMICS
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.9%
21
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
26
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%