Back

Dissociable effects of feature expectation on saccades and presaccadic perception

Zimmermann Bortoluzzi, L.; Rohenkohl, G.

2026-07-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.05.735520 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During active vision, the brain must coordinate where to move the eyes with predictions about upcoming sensory input. Before each saccade, perception is enhanced at the upcoming fixation location, but whether this enhancement depends on expectations about target features remains unknown. Here, participants prepared a saccade to a cued location while reporting the presence and orientation of a brief visual target that appeared either at the saccade goal or at the opposite location. Feature expectation was manipulated across blocks by varying the probability of the two target orientations. Perceptual sensitivity (d') increased when targets were presented at the saccade goal, consistent with presaccadic enhancement, and was also higher for less expected features. However, these effects were independent: feature probability did not alter the magnitude of presaccadic enhancement. Moreover, presaccadic enhancement increased near saccade onset, whereas the advantage for less expected features weakened as movement onset approached. Saccade latency revealed a contrasting pattern. Visual targets presented at the saccade goal delayed movement initiation. This delay depended on feature probability, with longer latencies for unexpected than for expected features only when saccades were directed towards the target. This location-specific effect persisted after accounting for perceptual report, and the latency cost for unexpected features was reproduced in a follow-up experiment. Together, these findings show that feature probability enhanced sensitivity to unexpected information independently of presaccadic enhancement, while selectively delaying saccade initiation towards targets with unexpected features. This dissociation suggests that feature expectation modulates perception and action through functionally distinct forms of visual processing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.1%
2
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.2%
4
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.5%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.9%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 11%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
10
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
11
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.1%
13
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
14
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
15
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.8%
17
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
19
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Vision Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.8%
25
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
26
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
28
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
29
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%