Organised cancer screening among women who receive medically assisted reproduction treatments
Walker, A. R.; Odahl, S.; Venetis, C.; Jorm, L.; Hacker, N. F.; Chapman, M.; Anazodo, A. C.; Norman, R. J.; Stern, C.; Sansom-Daly, U. M.; Chambers, G. M.; Vajdic, C. M.
Show abstract
There are no published data on cancer screening by women using medically assisted reproduction (MAR). Such data would aid interpretation of the cancer incidence and risk profiles for this group. Using linked population-based Australian health registries and administrative datasets, we compared organised publicly funded cervical and breast screening episodes for women who received one of three types of MAR and matched women who did not between 1991 and 2016. We modelled the proportion of women screened in the three years before and after first MAR treatment, adjusting for age, remoteness, parity, socio-economic disadvantage, cancer history, and uptake of the other screening program. After adjustment, a greater proportion of women who received MAR than women who did not had cervical screening before MAR (77.3%-84.1% vs 57.5%-62.0%, depending on treatment) and after MAR (77.0%-78.5% vs 68.1%-68.3%). Contrastingly, breast screening estimates were 7.6%-9.6% vs 9.3%-10.5% before MAR and 11.0%-15.0% vs 12.8%-14.9% after MAR.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- HPV self-sampling among long-term non-attenders to cervical cancer screening in Norway: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial 91%
- CA125 and age-based models for ovarian cancer detection in primary care: a population-based external validation study 91%
- Cost-effectiveness of CA125- and age-informed risk-based triage for ovarian cancer detection in primary care 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying molecular mediators of the relationship between body mass index and endometrial cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis 90%
- The relationships between women’s reproductive factors: a Mendelian randomization analysis 89%
- Evidence for treatment with estradiol for women with SARS-CoV-2 infection 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Stratifying IVF population endometria using a prognosis gradient independent of endometrial timing. 91%
- Genome-wide association study meta-analysis supports association between MUC1 and ectopic pregnancy 90%
- Impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in relation to infertility: a Mendelian randomization analysis in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cohort profile: The Bristol IVF Study- A longitudinal study of women, their partners and treatment outcomes following assisted reproductive technologies 91%
- Short-term outcomes of pubertal suppression in a selected cohort of 12 to 15 year old young people with persistent gender dysphoria in the UK 90%
- Uterine secretome initiates growth of gynecologic tissues in ectopic locations. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Free testosterone and malignant melanoma risk in men: prospective analyses of testosterone and SHBG with 19 cancers in men and postmenopausal women UK Biobank 89%
- Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I, total and free testosterone concentrations and prostate cancer risk in 200,000 men in UK Biobank 88%
- Reproductive Factors and Risk of Breast Cancer by Tumor Subtypes among Ghanaian Women: A Population-based Case-control Study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.