Back

Sex and Obesity Stratified Asthma GWAS in African and European Ancestry Populations

Qu, H.-Q.; March, M.; Mentch, F.; Qiu, H.; Connolly, J. J.; Glessner, J. T.; Hakonarson, H.

2026-07-07 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.07.05.26357321 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Biologically distinct asthma subgroups may obscure genetic effects when analyzed as a single phenotype. We examined whether asthma susceptibility signals are shared, heterogeneous, or stratum-specific across ancestry, obesity status, and sex. Methods: We performed ancestry-specific GWAS meta-analyses in African ancestry participants (9,965 asthma cases; 37,391 controls) and European ancestry participants (6,074 cases; 116,255 controls), followed by obesity- and sex-stratified analyses. Analyses used imputed dosages and fixed-effect meta-analysis within ancestry. Results: Stratification detected asthma association signals that were less apparent in the combined phenotype. Shared cross-ancestry loci implicated epithelial antiviral susceptibility and immune regulation, represented by signals near CDHR3 and FOXO1. An ancestry-heterogeneous signal at the 17q21 locus, harboring ORMDL3/GSDMB, supported population-dependent effects at an epithelial inflammatory locus. Obesity stratification mapped the genome-wide significant burden to asthma without obesity. Sex stratification detected genome-wide significant signals in AFR females with asthma and obesity and in both sex strata with asthma without obesity, with the strongest signal burden in EU females without obesity. Conclusions: Asthma genetic architecture differed by ancestry, obesity status, and sex. Stratified analyses identified group-specific susceptibility related to epithelial and immune regulation, airway inflammation, remodeling, and neural signaling, supporting precision approaches to asthma.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.