Back

The Width-Delay Index: a Glucose-Only OGTT Metric for Assessing Insulin Resistance

Zhang, R.

2026-07-07 endocrinology
10.64898/2026.07.05.26357315 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Insulin resistance is a core pathophysiologic feature of metabolic disease, but its reference-standard assessment by steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) testing is procedurally demanding and labor-intensive, limiting use in routine clinical care and large-scale research. Because OGTT glucose profiles are widely available, we aimed to develop a glucose-only metric to characterize dynamic glucose responses and estimate SSPG-measured insulin resistance. Methods: We developed the Width-Delay Index (WDI), a glucose-only OGTT metric integrating relative exposure width, delayed exposure timing, and glycemic floor. In a dataset of 32 subjects with 16-point venous OGTT profiles and paired SSPG measurements, WDI performance was assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) for SSPG prediction, together with insulin-resistance discrimination and sparse-sampling robustness analyses. Results: The 15-120 min OGTT window yielded the strongest WDI performance. WDI15-120 predicted SSPG with LOOCV R2 = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.27-0.77), Pearson r = 0.77, and Spearman rho = 0.74. WDI15-120 showed higher predictive performance than standard OGTT glucose measures and insulin-derived indices, including HOMA-IR, Matsuda index, and disposition index. WDI15-120 also discriminated insulin-resistant from insulin-sensitive subjects with AUROC = 0.969. When recalculated from conventional 5-point OGTT sampling, WDI15-120 retained substantial performance, with LOOCV R2 = 0.41 and AUROC = 0.945. Conclusions: WDI provides a simple, glucose-only, physiologically interpretable approach for estimating SSPG-measured insulin resistance from OGTT glucose dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.