Back

Physical Activity, Nutritional Status, and Cardiovascular Disease Prevalence in Geriatric Outpatients: A Cross-sectional Study in Swabi

Ayub, A.; Batool, S.

2026-07-06 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.05.26355867 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death among older people worldwide. Cardiovascular risk is high in the elderly, with modifiable risk factors including inactivity and poor diet. Objectives: To evaluate geriatric physical activity, nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)), cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence, and to explore the association between physical activity and nutrition with cardiovascular risk. Methodology: A cross-sectional study included 150 geriatrics. A structured questionnaire using a WHO aligned physical activity assessment tool (GPAQ) and the validated six-item MNA screening tool. Statistical analysis was done with IBM SPSS 22.0. Results: Among the participants, 56.7% were physically inactive, while 43.3% were active. CVD was present in 50.7% of participants. The mean MNA score was 8.83+/-1.98, indicating that a substantial proportion of participants were at risk of malnutrition. Physically active individuals demonstrated significantly lower odds of CVD compared with inactive participants (OR = 0.42, 95% Cl: 0.21 0.84, p = 0.014). Nutritional risk was also significantly associated with increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Physical inactivity and nutritional vulnerability are highly prevalent in this geriatric cohort and are significantly associated with CVD. 58% lower odds of CVD (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.21 0.84), though the wide interval precludes a precise estimate of effect magnitude. Keywords: Physical activity, cardiovascular diseases, geriatric, malnutrition, Physical inactivity, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Pakistan, Cross-sectional study.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.