Back

Approaching the limit: Modeling the physiological bounds of playable space in football

Zafar, A.; Krüll, M.; Guay, S.; De Beaumont, L.

2026-07-06 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.07.04.736520 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pitch control models quantify spatial dominance in football by estimating which player can arrive first at each pitch location, but they treat all players as equivalently capable regardless of preceding effort. We introduce physiology-aware pitch control (Phys-PC), a model-agnostic time-to-arrive correction that imposes two physiological capacity channels calibrated from tracking data: a transient recoverable burden capturing incomplete recovery from recent high-intensity efforts, and a cumulative non-recoverable drain accumulating across match play. Both channels reduce a bounded access scale that modulates kinematic TTA before any downstream pitch-control computation. All parameters are anchored to exercise-physiology benchmarks; no laboratory measurements are assumed. Applied to a 64-match international tournament, Phys-PC reveals structure that kinematic models cannot detect. In head-to-head races, the dominant burden channel shifts from transient to cumulative over the course of a match, with a transient resurgence in the final 15 minutes. These physiological asymmetries predict match outcomes: relative reserve advantage is associated with higher odds of winning ground challenges (OR = 1.20, p = 0.006; +4.2 pp), completing over-the-top passes past recovering defenders (OR = 1.45, p = 0.034; +8.3 pp), and progressing possession sequences into the final third (OR = 1.31, p = 0.013; +5.1 pp). At the player-profile level, an acute-cumulative decomposition of contested space access separates roles and individuals whose territorial reach is maintained through sustained positioning from those whose access is rebuilt through repeated high-intensity actions, providing a physiological lens on team tactical structure.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.7%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.7%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 8%
11.7%
5
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 9%
5.4%
7
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
10
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.5%
17
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
18
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
19
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
21
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%