Back

Prevalence of cancer in patients with cardiovascular diseases and risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Galimzhanov, A.; Beytekin, E.; Lim, L. C.; Ali Zai, A. B.; Doolub, G.; Aljarshawi, M.; Sokhal, B. S.; Matetic, A.; Bagur, R.; Sun, L.; Ng, C. H.; Menezes, M. N.; Zaman, S.; Ky, B.; Mamas, M.

2026-07-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.04.26357301 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background No systematic review has been conducted to pool the existing evidence and quantify cancer prevalence rates in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). We aimed to estimate pooled cancer prevalence in coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), stroke, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and valvular heart diseases (VHD). Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from 2010 to July 2024. The outcomes were proportions of patients with active, any, previous, blood, solid, and metastatic cancer. The prevalence rates were estimated via one-step generalized linear mixed models. Results Totally, we retrieved 676 studies with enrollment of roughly 180 million participants. The analysis for active cancer included 59 studies with a population of 4,759,695 patients. The pooled prevalence of active cancer was 4.22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.18-5.32), 4.43% (95% CI 2.78-6.38), 4.60% (95% CI 1.72-8.13), 4.61% (95% CI, 2.83-6.97), 4.90% (95% CI 3.84-6.37), and 5.55% (95% CI 3.97-7.01) in patients with type 2 DM, chronic HF, any stroke, CAD, VHD, and AF. For any cancer, prevalence rates ranged from 14.10% (95% CI 12.20-15.99) in AF to 7.04% (95% CI 6.05-8.03) in CAD. Conclusion Pooled prevalence rates demonstrate a measurable burden of cancer among patients with a wide range of CVDs, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management in this population.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.