Prevalence of cancer in patients with cardiovascular diseases and risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Galimzhanov, A.; Beytekin, E.; Lim, L. C.; Ali Zai, A. B.; Doolub, G.; Aljarshawi, M.; Sokhal, B. S.; Matetic, A.; Bagur, R.; Sun, L.; Ng, C. H.; Menezes, M. N.; Zaman, S.; Ky, B.; Mamas, M.
Show abstract
Background No systematic review has been conducted to pool the existing evidence and quantify cancer prevalence rates in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). We aimed to estimate pooled cancer prevalence in coronary artery disease (CAD), heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), stroke, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and valvular heart diseases (VHD). Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from 2010 to July 2024. The outcomes were proportions of patients with active, any, previous, blood, solid, and metastatic cancer. The prevalence rates were estimated via one-step generalized linear mixed models. Results Totally, we retrieved 676 studies with enrollment of roughly 180 million participants. The analysis for active cancer included 59 studies with a population of 4,759,695 patients. The pooled prevalence of active cancer was 4.22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.18-5.32), 4.43% (95% CI 2.78-6.38), 4.60% (95% CI 1.72-8.13), 4.61% (95% CI, 2.83-6.97), 4.90% (95% CI 3.84-6.37), and 5.55% (95% CI 3.97-7.01) in patients with type 2 DM, chronic HF, any stroke, CAD, VHD, and AF. For any cancer, prevalence rates ranged from 14.10% (95% CI 12.20-15.99) in AF to 7.04% (95% CI 6.05-8.03) in CAD. Conclusion Pooled prevalence rates demonstrate a measurable burden of cancer among patients with a wide range of CVDs, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management in this population.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Causes of death in people with cardiovascular disease: a prospective UK Biobank cohort study 95%
- Heart disease mortality in cancer survivors: A population-based study in Japan 94%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 94%
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 93%
- Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 94%
- Joint Association of Polygenic Risk and Social Determinants of Health with Coronary Heart Disease in the United States 91%
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Multinational Validation of an Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Detecting and Predicting Structural Heart Disease Using Noisy Single-lead Electrocardiograms 93%
- Natural Language Processing to Identify Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Aortic Stenosis 92%
- Prediction of Cardiovascular Markers and Diseases Using Retinal Fundus Images and Deep Learning: A Systematic Scoping Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in access to and outcomes of cardiac surgery in England: retrospective analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics (2010-2019) 92%
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 91%
- Place and causes of acute cardiovascular mortality during the COVID19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of 580,972 deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.