Back

Large-scale assessment of socioeconomic, demographic and health system structures with US county excess mortality, 2020-2024

Levitt, M.; Marten, B.; Oren, G.; Ioannidis, J.

2026-07-07 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.04.26357291 medRxiv
Show abstract

Socioeconomic, demographic, and health system structures may have shaped COVID-19 pandemic impact across populations, but past analyses typically examined few factors. We systematically examined correlates of COVID-era excess mortality, considering 2,745 county-level variables of demography, race/ethnicity, income, insurance, education, employment, housing, and health system. Pearson correlation coefficients (CCs) were obtained for the most recent available pre-pandemic value against age-standardized county excess-death for each year during 2020-2024. Counties were population-weighted. Variables were grouped by meaning into 11 semantic super-clusters. Overall, 17.3% of variables reached at least a moderate correlation level (|CC| > 0.30) and 2.8% reached strong correlations (|CC| > 0.45). Strongest correlations were seen for college attainment (CC -0.54), uninsurance among adults 40-64 (+0.53), and high income (-0.53). At least moderate correlations were seen for 9.1% of variables in 2020 and 8.5% in 2021, but only 1.8%, 0%, and 1.3% in 2022, 2023, and 2024, respectively. Similar patterns of concentration of moderate correlations in the first two pandemic years appeared in both elderly and non-elderly populations. Of 472 variables with |CC| > 0.30, 362/395 moderate-band and 77/77 strong-band variables belonged to demography and socioeconomic super-clusters. Only 7% of health system variables reached |CC| > 0.30, versus 31% of socioeconomic and demographic variables. Using the most recent available value until 2023 or 2015, different population weighting, and Spearman correlations yielded similar results. Overall, these ecological analyses suggest strong relationships of socioeconomic structure and demographics rather than health-care resources/supply with excess mortality across US counties especially during 2020-2021.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.2%
5
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
11
Demographic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
16
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
18
European Journal of Public Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
19
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
21
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%