Back

Genetic dose-response modelling predicts drug mechanisms, dosing, and adverse events

Stefanucci, L.; Considine, D.; Ke, Z.; Hellewell, J.; Bakker, O.; Alcantara, M. P.; Soskic, B.; Freimann, K.; Turchin, M. C.; Holzinger, E. R.; Chiou, J.; Nakic, N.; Ongen, H.; Lorenc, A.; Ghoussaini, M.; Buniello, A.; Dunham, I.; McDonagh, E. M.; Maranville, J. C.; Lees, J. A.; Alasoo, K.; Ochoa, D.; Tsepilov, Y.; Trynka, G.

2026-07-06 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.07.04.26357214 medRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how changes in gene function affect disease risk is central to drug development. Genetic variants are natural perturbations of gene activity and provide an opportunity to systematically model dose-response relationships between genes and phenotypes. Here, we present Variant-Informed Dose-Response Analysis (VIDRA), a computational framework that integrates trait-associated variants spanning a spectrum of allele frequencies and functional consequences within a hierarchical Bayesian regression model to systematically infer genetic dose-response relationships. Using 1,607,115 phenotypically associated germline variants available through Open Targets data (including common trait, rare disease, and gene burden associations), we systematically modelled how genetically driven alterations in gene function relate to disease risk, generating 148,350 dose-response-like gene-phenotype relationships across 7,681 phenotypes. Incorporating rare variant information alongside common variants resulted in a 7.23-fold increase in unique phenotypes, and a 51% increase in gene-disease pair associations. We calibrated our model against known drug targets to derive VIDRA Therapeutic Potential Score to rank genes based on their likelihood of succeeding as therapies, and identified 1,860 significant genes, 87% of which are currently therapeutically not targeted. VIDRA framework captures the direction and magnitude of gene-phenotype dependencies, enabling insights beyond target identification. Sixty-two percent of high-scoring targets are predicted to benefit from agonistic modulation, highlighting untapped potential for therapeutic activation. Furthermore, VIDRA framework extends to modelling relationships between genes, intermediate phenotypes, and diseases, enabling identification of biomarker-disease correlations. Applied to blood-cell and cardiovascular traits, VIDRA recovered known genetic links, suggesting a capacity to identify novel biomarker-disease relationships. Lastly, we observed a positive correlation by comparing VIDRA slopes with drug dose-response data from clinical trials, supporting the use of genetic data as a proxy for pharmacological titration. Together, VIDRA framework provides a generalizable, interpretable approach to inform multiple stages of drug development, from target prioritization and therapeutic direction of modulation prediction to biomarker identification, dose guidance, and safety risk assessment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 7%
21.5%
2
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.7%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.4%
5
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
6
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.1%
9
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
12
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.3%
14
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
20
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
25
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
28
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%