Back

Oral levosulpiride adjuvant to intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema: A 24-week randomized placebo-controlled trial

Adan-Castro, E.; Nunez-Amaro, C. D.; Villareal, J.; H. Islas, I.; Hernandez-Quijano, A.; Rodriguez-Chagoya,, B. E.; Garcia-Roa, M.; Lopez-Star, E.; Garcia-Franco,, R.; Robles-Osorio,, M. L.; Martinez de la Escalera, G.; Clapp, C.

2026-07-07 ophthalmology
10.64898/2026.07.04.26357144 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background/Objective: Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a leading cause for visual impairment primarily managed with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents such as ranibizumab (RBZ). Levosulpiride (LSP), a prokinetic medication, was recently repositioned as a safe oral treatment for naive DMO. Here, we investigated the adjuvant effect of oral LSP in combination with intravitreal RBZ injections for treating persistent DMO. Subjects/Methods: Double-blinded, dual-centre, phase 2 trial in patients with centre-involving DMO randomly assigned to be orally treated with placebo (15 patients, 18 eyes) or LSP (18 patients, 19 eyes) along with 3 successive (4 weeks apart) RBZ intravitreal injections and a 24-week follow-up. Results: Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved (p[≤]0.04) at week 12 in both RBZ+placebo and RBZ+LSP, but improvement was maintained (p=0.009) at week 24 only in RBZ+LSP. In agreement, longitudinal changes from baseline in BCVA from weeks 12 to 24 defined superior (p=0.02) visual gains measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) in RBZ+LSP vs. RBZ+placebo. The baseline value of mean central foveal thickness (CFT) decreased (p[≤]0.002) in both groups at week 12 and CFT reduction was significant (p=0.006) at week 24 only in RBZ+LSP. Also, longitudinal changes from baseline in CFT resulted in a higher AUC reduction (p[≤]0.04) at weeks 4 to12 in RBZ+LSP vs. RBZ+placebo. No significant adverse side effects were detected. Conclusions: Adjunctive LSP showed functional and anatomical benefits over the first-line therapy with RBZ. Adjuvant properties may involve the LSP-induced intraocular upregulation and downregulation of vasoinhibin and VEGF, respectively. Larger clinical trials are warranted.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Eye
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
18.2%
3
Translational Vision Science & Technology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.7%
4
Ophthalmology Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
6
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
British Journal of Ophthalmology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
9
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Angiogenesis
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Experimental Eye Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%