Back

Characterization of Leukodystrophy Penetrance Using Large-Scale Integration of Genomic Population Screening and Electronic Health Records

Happ, H.; Christensen, B.; Knight, S.; Novoa, A.; Isakson, D.; Nadauld, L.; Quinlan, A.; Bonkowsky, J. L.

2026-07-06 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.07.04.26356970 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives: Leukodystrophies are rare genetic diseases affecting the central nervous system white matter, leading to progressive disabilities and death. Although early diagnosis is critical for therapies, the penetrance and phenotypic spectrum of many leukodystrophies remain poorly defined. Here, we integrate sequencing population screening with longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) data. Our goals were to assess the prevalence of undiagnosed leukodystrophy, characterize phenotypic variability among genotype-positive individuals, and estimate penetrance across multiple leukodystrophies. Methods: We analyzed 19 genes associated with 13 leukodystrophies in pediatric and adult individuals recruited via the HerediGene Population Study, a 5-year study conducted primarily of healthy individuals in the U.S. intermountain west. Sequencing was performed on 210,983 individuals, consisting of genome sequencing for 34,033 and SNP panel imputation for 176,950. Variant results were cross-referenced to comprehensive and longitudinal (20+ years) clinical data in the Intermountain Health Enterprise Data Warehouse and to the Utah Leukodystrophy Program. Results: Pathogenic variants were identified in 4 genes (CSF1R, PLP1, POLR3A, SNORD118) in 9 individuals, none of whom had a clinical leukodystrophy diagnosis or characteristic MRI findings. These findings suggest that missed clinical diagnoses of most leukodystrophies are uncommon in a centralized healthcare system, but also demonstrate that for some leukodystrophies there may be variable or reduced penetrance, or broader phenotypic spectra than recognized. We used published incidence estimates and the observed leukodystrophy-associated genotypes to infer penetrance ranges that varied from wide for ultra-rare leukodystrophies, to tightly bounded for more prevalent conditions. Discussion: In this predominantly healthy population, we did not find any patients with leukodystrophy who had been genetically undiagnosed but then identified by sequencing. However, we identified 9 individuals with genotypes previously reported to result in leukodystrophy, but none of whom had clinical symptoms or MRI features associated with the specific leukodystrophy. Our results support a revised model in which leukodystrophies exist along a continuum of penetrance and expressivity, with implications for newborn screening, variant interpretation, and risk stratification.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
3
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
8
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
9
Human Mutation
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
10
Human Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
11
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
12
Neurology Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
14
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 71%
1.0%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
18
Human Molecular Genetics
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Pediatrics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%