Back

RulePep: Interpretable ESM-Guided Neural-Symbolic Peptide Classification

Midjani, F.; Ghelich, R.; Keshtkar, F. Z.; Malekpour, M.; Lee, H.

2026-07-06 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.03.736448 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Peptides are increasingly explored as therapeutic candidates, delivery vectors, and functional biomolecules, but experimental screening of peptide activity and safety remains costly because the sequence space is vast and small sequence changes can alter functionality. Computational peptide classification can therefore help prioritize candidates. However, many protein-language-model-based classifiers achieve strong performance using opaque prediction heads, making it difficult to determine which learned evidence supports or opposes a prediction. We present RulePep, an ESM-2-guided neural-symbolic classifier for peptide-function prediction. RulePep maps frozen ESM-2 sequence representation to learned latent predicates, polarity-constrained differentiable rules, and an additive symbolic logit whose components can be inspected at the case level. We evaluate RulePep on three biologically distinct peptide classification tasks: blood-brain barrier penetration, hemolytic potency, and anticancer activity. On the BBPpredict, HemoPI3, and AntiCP 2.0 alternate benchmark datasets, RulePep achieved AUROC/MCC values of 0.8869/0.6850, 0.9155/0.6820, and 0.9765/0.8633, respectively. Ablation experiments supported the contributions of multi-layer representation pooling, rule polarity, mined-rule initialization, symbolic capacity, and rule-derived aggregation. RulePep combines competitive predictive performance with additive logit reconstruction, rule-level evidence reporting, and predicate-suppression auditing, providing a transparent sequence-based framework for peptide candidate prioritization.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.5%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
3
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 26%
5.6%
5
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
7
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
9
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Communications Chemistry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
15
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
17
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
19
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
21
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
23
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.6%
25
Journal of Cheminformatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%