Back

Combinatorial adapter targeting enables AND-gate activation of AdCAR T cells in pancreatic cancer but reveals donor-dependent activation thresholds

Dourlens, C.; Vanderliek, K.; Hardt, O.; Schaefer, D.

2026-07-09 immunology
10.64898/2026.07.03.736407 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal malignancy with limited therapeutic options, underscoring the need for innovative treatments. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy has transformed hematologic malignancies but faces key challenges in solid tumors, particularly on-target/off-tumor toxicity and antigen heterogeneity. Adapter CAR (AdCAR) platforms offer enhanced control by decoupling antigen recognition from CAR activation, enabling controllable, reversible, and multi-antigen targeting. Recent studies suggest AdCARs can function as an AND-gate using combinations of adapter molecules at controlled surface densities. This defines activation thresholds, termed the Surface Activation Matrix, that restricts full activation to tumor cells overexpressing the target antigen combination, thereby reducing off-tumor toxicity. In this study, we evaluated its applicability to PDAC using adapters targeting CD318, TSPAN8 and CD66c. We systematically evaluated single and combinatorial adapter dosing in co-culture assays with AsPC1 cells, in a donor-dependent manner. Low concentrations of individual adapters were non-cytotoxic, whereas combining them at identical sub-threshold doses restored potent tumor killing, demonstrating that AdCAR activation depends on cumulative adapter density rather than total amount. However, the activation threshold required for AND-gate cytotoxicity varied between donors, highlighting the need for patient-specific titration to achieve selective tumor killing. These findings validate that AdCAR T cell activity in PDAC can be finely tuned through adapter concentration and combinatorial targeting, enabling selective tumor recognition while minimizing on-target/off-tumor toxicity. This flexible, safety-oriented strategy supports targeting heterogeneous PDAC tumors, though donor-dependent variability remains a critical consideration for clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.1%
2
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.5%
4
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
7
Molecular Therapy Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.7%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
14
Cancer Discovery
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
23
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
26
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Neuro-Oncology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
European Journal of Immunology
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Immunity
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%