Back

Two-tower models for genomic prediction of reproductive outcomes and sex-specific fertility liabilities: simulation insights

Pappas, F.; Palaiokostas, C.; Debes, P. V.; Johnsson, M.

2026-07-09 genetics
10.64898/2026.07.03.736358 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many biological characteristics arise by interactions between more than one biological organism or unit. Fertilization success in sexually reproducing species represents such an extended phenotype where both mates are required to be fertile for a successful outcome. Consequently, predictive models should account for the joint nature of reproductive performance while offering interpretable estimates for individual mate contributions. Recent advances in genomics and machine learning (ML) provide standardized, high-dimensional genetic information on one hand and computational tools capable of modeling complex biological systems on the other. Here, we construct and evaluate two-tower (TT) machine learning architectures for genomic prediction of binary reproductive outcomes and recovery of sex-specific fertility liabilities. Simulated datasets, generated under a range of genetic architectures, were utilized to compare multilayer perceptron (TT-MLP), convolutional neural network (TT-CNN), and L1-regularized linear (TT-LASSO) two-tower models. Simulation scenarios varied sex-specific heritabilities, genetic correlations, infertility prevalence, mating structure, and sex-specific infertility rates. Models were evaluated with regard to their ability to predict reproductive success at pair level and also recover true underlying genetic values for male and female fertility. Prediction accuracy increased with the underlying heritable component as expected, while sex-specific tower-scores successfully recovered latent fertility liabilities despite models being trained only on observed joint outcomes. TT-LASSO achieved the highest overall classification performance, whereas TT-MLP provided more balanced and consistent recovery of sex-specific genetic values across scenarios. An additional simulation, incorporating genotype-dependent mate compatibility demonstrated advantages of fully-connected neural networks for capturing non-additive interactions. These results indicate that two-tower frameworks provide a powerful approach for modeling reproductive traits, enabling simultaneous prediction of aggregate reproductive outcomes and sex-specific fertility liabilities from genotypic information.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.5%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
4
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
7
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.4%
8
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
11
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
14
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
18
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Genetics Selection Evolution
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%
25
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
29
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%