Back

The mammalian muscle spindle as a tunable feedback controller in locomotion

Simha, S. N.; Sawicki, G. S.; Cope, T. C.; Ting, L. H.

2026-07-09 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.03.736206 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Although muscle spindle sensory signals have been extensively studied, little is known about how and why muscle spindle firing is modulated by the central nervous system during movement. Specialized motor neurons to the muscle spindle, i.e. gamma motor neurons, can profoundly alter spindle firing during behavior, but technological limitations hinder our ability to record gamma motor and muscle spindle sensory signals during most behaviors. We used a biophysical model of a muscle spindle within a muscle-tendon unit to simulate how gamma drive may modulate muscle spindle Ia firing during locomotion. Based on a few available recordings from decerebrate animals, we demonstrate that our model, tuned to passive stretch conditions, can reproduce profound changes in muscle spindle firing in response to identical joint motions in locomotor vs. relaxed stretch conditions. Our model can discover phasic patterns of two types of gamma motor neuron drive based on recorded muscle spindle Ia firing and joint motion. By simulating perturbations, we conclude that: 1) sinusoidal activation of static gamma motor neurons during locomotion, encoding intended movement, modulates muscle spindle signals such that they act as sensorimotor feedback signals based on errors from the intended muscle fascicle length; 2) phasic on/off activation of dynamic gamma motor neurons during locomotion acts as an event detector, heightening muscle spindle Ia responses to discrete perturbations. As such, their muscle-within-muscle structure allows the muscle spindle to act as a highly tunable physical internal model of muscle state to guide movement. Our model supports proposed but as-yet-untested theories of muscle spindle function and offers a framework for extending the testing of muscle spindle function to active, behavioral conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.0%
2
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.4%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 12%
8.6%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
9
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.9%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.6%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.6%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.5%
17
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
20
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
23
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%