Back

Ancestral gene flow shaped the singular origin of the Amazon molly

Berbel-Filho, W. M.; Chin, M.; Kulik, D.; Matura, F.; Reich, T.; Dedukh, D.; Ubeda, F.; Fyon, F.; Marta, A.; Dolezalkova-Kastankov, M.; Laskowski, K.; Schlupp, I.; Janko, K.

2026-07-03 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.07.03.734242 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The evolutionary origins of asexuality remain poorly understood, despite extensive research on its ecological and evolutionary consequences. Asexuality often arises through hybridization between species with intermediate genomic divergence, implying that hybrid-induced asexuality may be partly repeatable. The Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa), the first asexual vertebrate known to science, challenges this view: repeated experimental crosses between its extant parental species have failed to recreate a stable Amazon molly-like lineage. This apparent paradox gave rise to the Rare Formation Hypothesis, which proposes that stable asexuality requires an exceptionally specific genomic combination. Here, we combine experimental crosses, molecular cytogenetics, and population genomics to test whether ancestral introgression before the hybrid speciation event set the stage for the singular origin of the Amazon molly. We show that most experimental hybrids are viable but sexual, but that a subset of F1 hybrids produce unreduced eggs through a mechanism distinct from that of the Amazon molly. Population genomic analyses reveal that introgression between parental species likely predated the formation of the Amazon molly, and shared homozygous tracts across Amazon molly genomes support inheritance from admixed progenitors. Together, our findings reconcile the repeatable and contingent views of the origin of asexuality, suggesting that ancestral introgression may be the missing mechanism assembling the rare genomic combinations required for seemingly unrepeatable evolutionary innovations, including the emergence of asexual species.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.9%
2
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.7%
3
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
10.3%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.3%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 14%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.1%
7
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.3%
8
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.4%
9
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
11
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
14
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%