Back

Anthropogenic subsidies reshape Ruby-throated Hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) interactions across spatial and temporal contexts: evidence from community-collected data

Narango, D. L.; Jones, A.; Rebozo, R.; Sosa, P.; Hallworth, M.

2026-07-06 ecology
10.64898/2026.07.03.733347 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1. Ruby-throated hummingbirds (Archilochus colubris) exhibit flower preferences and readily visit human subsidies like feeders. However, foraging behavior and plant-animal interactions may vary across spatial, temporal, and landscape gradients. Despite the popularity and ubiquity of Ruby-throated Hummingbirds in the eastern U.S., there has never been a quantitative assessment of their flower preferences or feeder use across broad scales. 2. We investigated how feeder visitation, flower visitation, and flower trait preferences vary by latitude, season, and land use in the northeastern United States using over 6 million occurrence records of Ruby-throated Hummingbirds and flowering plants, >2,100 annotated hummingbird-flower interactions, and >2,700 feeder visit occurrences. 3. We found that hummingbird feeder use declined over the year, increased with latitude, and was higher in developed landscapes. Flower visitation increased over the year across all latitudes, with higher visitation in developed landscapes. Finally, we found that native plant use diverged between landscapes, such that the probability of visiting a native flower increased over time in non-developed land uses but declined over time in developed ones, demonstrating that hummingbirds track the advancement of native floral phenology and use non-native, cultivated flowers as a human subsidy due to either availability or preferences. 4. Our preference and network models revealed that while hummingbird-plant network structure was similar across landscapes, the composition of important taxa shifted from native, wild species like Monarda and Impatiens to non-native, cultivated species like Salvia. 5. Using trait-based models of flower visitation, we found that hummingbirds preferred native, tubular, and red/orange flowers fitting the hummingbird pollination syndrome despite visiting >260 different plant species. Red and orange flowers were preferred across all seasons, suggesting color may be a reliable signal of nectar availability across species and contexts. Native and tubular flowers were strongly preferred during the breeding season; however, preferences relaxed during spring and fall migration. 6. These findings reveal the consistent preferences of Ruby-throated Hummingbirds for native, tubular, and red/orange flowers, and underscore how spatial and temporal factors reshape foraging behavior and trait preferences. Our results also highlight the value of community-collected data in characterizing plant-pollinator interactions across broad spatial and temporal scales.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.9%
2
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
3
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.2%
4
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
5
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
7
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
8
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
11
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.3%
13
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
14
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
15
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
16
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
18
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
19
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.6%
20
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
21
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
24
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
25
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
26
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
29
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
30
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%