Back

FEATMAP: Targeted Correction of Acquisition Signatures Harmonizes Medical Foundation Model Embeddings and Enables Robust Task Generalization

Donle, L.; Phillips, M.; Gaber, F.; Ramesh, S.; Sacco, M.; Hautaniemi, S.; Virtanen, A.; Bressem, K.; Adams, L.; Goon, K.; Nevins, E.; Robinett, R. A.; Kochanny, S.; Hassan, S.; Dolezal, J.; Pearson, A. T.; Lengyel, E.

2026-07-08 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.07.02.736184 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Medical foundation models compress biomedical data into embeddings that support diverse downstream clinical tasks. However, successful model deployment is hampered by performance degradation on external data. It is recognized that embeddings capture acquisition signatures, such as hardware and technical differences, in addition to biology. Effective harmonization must remove the acquisition signature while preserving biological signals, a trade-off that current methods fail to balance adequately. Input-level normalization fails to eliminate acquisition signatures from embeddings, whereas embedding-level methods adjust features in an untargeted manner. We present FEATMAP, a harmonization approach that models acquisition signatures as geometric distortions between manifolds of similarly arranged embeddings. Using paired data that isolate the effect of acquisition signatures, FEATMAP fits a single global affine transformation per foundation model to correct acquisition signatures directly in the embedding space. This targeted, reusable correction aims to preserve biological and demographic variation while harmonizing across acquisition signatures. Across scanner and foundation-model harmonization in digital pathology and field-strength harmonization in brain MRI, FEATMAP improves cross-condition embedding similarity, reduces performance gaps without retraining, and suggests potential for the alignment of disparate embedding spaces.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.7%
3
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.1%
6
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
7
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
9
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
13
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
15
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
Nature Biomedical Engineering
47 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
25
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%