Nemo2.4: fast and accurate quantitative genetics forward-time simulations
Guillaume, F.; Cotto, O.; Chebib, J.; Beeravolu Reddy, C.; Schmid, M.
Show abstract
We present Nemo 2.4, an advanced forward-time individual-based simulation framework designed to model the complex eco-evolutionary dynamics and genetic basis of quantitative traits. This tool addresses current challenges in evolutionary quantitative genetics by providing unprecedented flexibility and computational efficiency. Nemo 2.4's modular architecture allows researchers to design custom life cycles by combining specialized Life Cycle Event (LCE) modules, from reproduction and dispersal to selection, crossing, and phenotype expression. The software supports diverse population models, including both Wright-Fisher (WF) and non-WF dynamics, spatially explicit models, and varying demography. Nemo 2.4 handles a wide range of genetic architectures, including both multi-allelic Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) for general trait studies, and dense di-allelic Quantitative Trait Nucleotides (QTN) implemented with highly optimized bit-wise data structures. Crucially, it allows the simulation of QTNs on comprehensive genetic maps that incorporate other genetic elements, providing genomic-scale resolution. Key biological complexities are integrated natively: the model accommodates modular pleiotropy, dominance, and pairwise epistasis across multiple traits, facilitating the study of complex genotype-phenotype mappings. Furthermore, Nemo 2.4 models phenotypic plasticity through reaction norms and incorporates underlying liability thresholds, enabling the simulation of environmental influences on trait evolution with various forms of selection (e.g., Gaussian, linear, truncation). Due to its compiled design and memory-efficient data representations for large numbers of loci, Nemo provides a robust platform for running high-throughput simulations critical for testing theoretical predictions in polygenic adaptation and understanding evolutionary responses to changing environments.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.