Back

Shared Neuroanatomy, Separate Mechanism: in vivo ERK and mTOR Manipulations Reveal Female-Specific Molecular Signaling for Auditory Forebrain-Dependent Learning in Juveniles

Maheshwar, K. V.; Chari, S.; London, S. E.

2026-07-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.02.736152 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developmental experience can produce lasting changes in neural function and behavior. Zebra finch offers a powerful model for identifying the molecular mechanisms underlying this process. Both juvenile male and female zebra finches perform developmental sensory song learning that influences their adult behaviors: in males, the structure of the song they sing and in female, the song preferences they exhibit (females cannot sing). The auditory forebrain, a region distinct from but connected to nodes of the male singing circuitry, is required for male sensory song learning. Song experience induces epigenetic, genomic, molecular, cellular and systems-level alterations in the auditory forebrain of males. Much less evidence is available for females. Although epigenetic and molecular data implicate the auditory forebrain in female sensory song learning, there has been no causal test of its role. Further, molecular evidence indicates the potential for distinct mechanisms for male and female sensory song learning, even though they learn during a largely overlapping developmental period. We used pharmacological manipulations of the ERK and mTOR cascades in the auditory forebrain of juvenile females during controlled tutoring, and an operant assay for adult song preference, to test the causal role of the auditory forebrain and the two cascades known to be required for male sensory song learning. We demonstrate that the auditory forebrain is required for female sensory song learning, and that while ERK signaling is necessary for both sexes, that of mTOR is sex specific. Results raise implications for alternative molecular cascade cross-talks and protein synthesis processes that successfully support the developmental learning at the same age and brain region.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
16.8%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.7%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
7.2%
4
Hormones and Behavior
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
8
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 15%
2.4%
10
Journal of Comparative Neurology
73 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Developmental Neurobiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
15
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
17
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
18
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
20
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
22
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Genes, Brain and Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%